2003
DOI: 10.1207/s15326950dp3502_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Questions in Time: Investigating the Structure and Dynamics of Unfolding Classroom Discourse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
401
0
33

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 497 publications
(472 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
9
401
0
33
Order By: Relevance
“…This could imply that teachers use a more monologic than dialogic type of interaction, which may require less behavior aimed at triggering production (Nystrand, 2003). When supporting teachers in improving their AL stimulating behavior during mathematics instructtion, we need to take teaching profiles, use of instructional methods and also types of interaction into account.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This could imply that teachers use a more monologic than dialogic type of interaction, which may require less behavior aimed at triggering production (Nystrand, 2003). When supporting teachers in improving their AL stimulating behavior during mathematics instructtion, we need to take teaching profiles, use of instructional methods and also types of interaction into account.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This type of interaction is more interactive, more conversation-like and more coherent than monologically organized interaction, where the main speaker, mostly the teacher, operates from a predetermined script. In dialogically organized instruction, the learning of knowledge is seen as a transformation of understandings instead of as a transmission of knowledge (Nystrand, 2003). Considering the need for negotiating meaning to learn AL, dialogically organized instruction can be expected to be effective for stimulating AL development.…”
Section: Organizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The notion of 'teaching through dialogue' encompasses pedagogical traditions from Socrates onwards and ranges from educational philosophy with focus on dialogue as inquiry (e.g., Dewey, 1916Dewey, /2005Wells, 1999), to principles for teaching dialogue (e.g., Isaacs, 1999a and1999b), to research on classroom discourse (e.g., Nystrand, Wu, Gamoran, Zeiser, & Long, 2003;Skidmore & Murakami, 2016), and on exploratory talk (Barnes, 1976;Mercer, 2000) and collaborative inquiry (e.g., Garrison & Anderson, 2003;Garrison, 2016).…”
Section: Defining Dialogue and Its Purposementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While pioneering studies do exist, e.g. on assessing classroom questions using a scale between 'monologic' and 'dialogic' (Nystrand, Wu, Gamoran, Zeiser, & Long, 2003), these tools are not yet available as formats or procedures that teachers would be able to incorporate in their classroom (see Reznitskaya, 2012, for a more manageable Dialogic Index Tool to help teachers assess their own classroom practice).…”
Section: Conclusion a Revised Definition Of Dialogic Literacy And DImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Les enseignants n'ont pas encore l'habitude de laisser les élèves problématiser le texte et diriger leur (Nystrand, Wu, Gamoran, Zeiser et Long, 2003;Nelson Chrytoph et Nystrand, 2001 ). De plus, non seulement le temps alloué aux discussions authentiques au secondaire est-il très restreint, mais il serait à peu près inexistant dans les classes difficiles (Nystrand, 1999).…”
Section: Lecture Critique Et Littératie Critique : Quelles Différences?unclassified