1979
DOI: 10.1086/202319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Questions in the Sacred-Cow Controversy [and Comments and Reply]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…16 Marvin Harris's reductionist assessment that technoenvironmental pressures led to cow protection in India has generated a great deal of controversy. Those interested in this debate can consult Simoons (1979). A more contemporary (and politically contentious) challenge to bovine sacrality has come from historian Dwijendra Narayan Jha, whose The Myth of the Holy Cow (2002) engages assumptions regarding the Hindu diet by exploring beef-eating in ancient Indian texts.…”
Section: Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 Marvin Harris's reductionist assessment that technoenvironmental pressures led to cow protection in India has generated a great deal of controversy. Those interested in this debate can consult Simoons (1979). A more contemporary (and politically contentious) challenge to bovine sacrality has come from historian Dwijendra Narayan Jha, whose The Myth of the Holy Cow (2002) engages assumptions regarding the Hindu diet by exploring beef-eating in ancient Indian texts.…”
Section: Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…of India 1977; 44 000 yaks and mithuns not included). Generally, the Indian cattle are considered to be of poor quality, uneconomical and a burden on land; and it is suggested that a large number of cattle may be slaughtered for beef but for their religious significance to the Hindu majority (Simoons 1979). According to some observers, possibly as many as one-third to one-half of the Indian cattle population may be regarded as surplus; and the crucial problem is what should be done with such cattle when the cows are non-productive and the bullocks are over age for use as draft animals (Ravenholt 1966).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This interdependence between subsistence farming and cattle led Marvin Harris (1966) to argue that a relatively high ratio of cattle to humans as ecologically unavoidable. His writings have contributed to protracted controversy for almost two decades (see, for example, Heston 1971;Simoons 1979;Freed and Freed 1981). Harris's paper has drawn attention to examining the economic significance and function of the holy cow in India.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He argues, &dquo;My intention is to argue that explanation of taboos, customs, and rituals associated with management of cattle be sought in positive functioned and probably the adaptive process of the ecological system of which they are a part rather than in the influence of Hindu theology&dquo; (1966: 51). A large number of social scientists have opposed Harris's techno-environmental interpretation of the sacred-the cow ideology in India (Dandekar: 1964), Heston (1971), Mishra (1973;1978), Simoons (1979), Lodrick (1979), and Freed and Freed (1981). The negative functioned traits of the religious proscriptions against the slaughter of cattle have been used as evidence to argue that religious beliefs rather than technoenvironmental adaptation influence behaviour towards the the cow in India.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%