Questionnaires for Assessment of Female Sexual Dysfunction: A Review and Proposal for a Standardized Screener

Abstract

Introduction There are many methods to evaluate female sexual function and dysfunction (FSD) in clinical and research settings, including questionnaires, structured interviews, and detailed case histories. Of these, questionnaires have become an easy first choice to screen individuals into different categories of FSD. Aim The aim of this study was to review the strengths and weaknesses of different questionnaires currently available to assess different dimensions of women's sexual function and dysfunction, and to suggest a simple screener for FSD. Methods A literature search of relevant databases, books, and articles in journals was used to identify questionnaires that have been used in basic or epidemiological research, clinical trials, or in clinical settings. Main Outcome Measure Measures were grouped in four levels based on their purposes and degree of development, and were reviewed for their psychometric properties and utility in clinical or research settings. A Sexual Complaints Screener for Women (SCS-W) was then proposed based on epidemiological methods. Results Although many questionnaires are adequate for their own purposes, our review revealed a serious lack of standardized, internationally (culturally) acceptable questionnaires that are truly epidemiologically validated in general populations and that can be used to assess FSD in women with or without a partner and independent of the partner's gender. The SCS-W is proposed as a 10-item screener to aid clinicians in making a preliminary assessment of FSD. Conclusions The definition of FSD continues to change and basic screening tools are essential to help advance clinical diagnosis and treatment, or to slate patients adequately into the right diagnostic categories for basic and epidemiological research or clinical trials.

Female Sexual Dysfunction in Elfayoum Governorate

“…Many methods such as questionnaires, structured interviews, and detailed case histories are used to survey and classification of subjects according to affected sexual domain [7].…”

“…Questionnaires have been considered an easy first choice to screen individuals and putting them in different classes of FSD [7].…”

The Relationship Between Body Mass Index and Sexual Dysfunction Among Women: A Meta-Analysis

“…Thus, examining this disorder is a major research priority in the present century (8,13). In this regard, many researchers have studied its connection with numerous emotional, psychological and social issues, especially physical factors like body mass index (1,(12)(13)(14)(15)(16).…”

Alexithymia and vaginismus: a preliminary correlation perspective

“…The score of dysfunctional sexuality is lower 26.55. [25][26][27] Patients and screened controls were assessed by the Italian version of TAS-20. This is a three-factor model, thus evaluating the emotion regulation by dividing scores into three cognitive-affective areas.…”