2020
DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.14497
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Questionnaires as screening tools for children with cerebral visual impairment

Abstract: This commentary is on the original article by Ben Itzhak et al. on pages 969–976 of this issue.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though an etiological and radiological analysis goes beyond the purpose of this paper, these results may have interesting implications for the clinical management and follow-up of these children. Indeed, ‘at risk’ children who are already under clinical follow-up would benefit from early CVI screening, requiring attention to medical history and clinical characteristics such as VI in absence of an ocular problem of such entity to justify a functional deficit [ 1 , 4 , 10 , 17 ]. Children above 3 years of age would also benefit from screening tools such as specific questionnaires [ 10 , 18 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even though an etiological and radiological analysis goes beyond the purpose of this paper, these results may have interesting implications for the clinical management and follow-up of these children. Indeed, ‘at risk’ children who are already under clinical follow-up would benefit from early CVI screening, requiring attention to medical history and clinical characteristics such as VI in absence of an ocular problem of such entity to justify a functional deficit [ 1 , 4 , 10 , 17 ]. Children above 3 years of age would also benefit from screening tools such as specific questionnaires [ 10 , 18 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is considerable consensus on the necessity to identify CVI early, since its prompt diagnosis and characterization are fundamental to define the best treatment [ 11 , 14 , 17 ]. Previous works have pointed out the necessity of a classification of CVI subtypes based on visual function [ 1 , 18 , 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As one of the most common causes of visual impairment of cortical origin, cerebral visual impairment (CVI) can result from early brain damage, including a potentially large panel of correlated deficits beyond vision due to damages of the dorsal stream, the ventral stream, or both (Bennett et al, 2020). Behaviorally, it is possible to detect CVI by means of dedicated questionnaires (Gorrie et al, 2019;Fazzi and Micheletti, 2020). At the neural level, a relatively early detection of CVI is based on the analysis of visual evoked potentials which, already at 6 months of age, can appear abnormal and therefore suggest the presence of CVI (Mercuri et al, 1997b), further depending on the size (Mercuri et al, 1998) and location (Mercuri et al, 1997a) of the brain lesion.…”
Section: Cerebral Visual Impairmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their results showed CVI remains a clinical diagnosis and their question inventory should only be used to identify “symptoms” associated with CVI. Several other questionnaires and modifications of the questionnaires have been developed and utilized to detect HVFDs in children with CVI ( Ortibus et al, 2011 ; van Genderen et al, 2012 ; Geldof et al, 2015 ; Salavati et al, 2017 ; Ben Itzhak et al, 2019 ; Gorrie et al, 2019 ; Fazzi and Micheletti, 2020 , and for a recent review see McConnell et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%