1997
DOI: 10.1037/0022-0167.44.1.63
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Questionnaire for Eating Disorder Diagnoses: Reliability and validity of operationalizing DSM—IV criteria into a self-report format.

Abstract: The Questionnaire for Eating Disorder Diagnoses (Q-EDD) operationalizes eating disorder criteria of the 4th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders and differentiates (a) between those with and without an eating disorder diagnosis, (b) among eating-disordered, symptomatic, and asymptomatic individuals, and (c) between those with anorexia and bulimia diagnoses. Three studies examined the Q-EDD's psychometric properties. Convergent validity was supported by correspondence between Q-E… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
220
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 190 publications
(226 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
4
220
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, there are limits to the generalizability to older persons and to more ethnically diverse populations. However, the sample does represent a group that is at relatively high risk for disordered eating (Mintz, O'Halloran, Mulholland, & Schneider, 1997). Since the study is correlational, no causal relationships can be established between emotional eating and BMI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, there are limits to the generalizability to older persons and to more ethnically diverse populations. However, the sample does represent a group that is at relatively high risk for disordered eating (Mintz, O'Halloran, Mulholland, & Schneider, 1997). Since the study is correlational, no causal relationships can be established between emotional eating and BMI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on their QEDD responses (Mintz et al, 1997), the athletes were classified as symptomatic (n ϭ 39; 19.2%) and asymptomatic (n ϭ 164; 80.8%); no athletes were classified as having a clinical eating disorder. To further establish the validity of the QEDD categories for male athletes, we compared the groups on their BULIT-R scores and were found to differ sig- nificantly, F(1, 201) Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 50-item Questionnaire for Eating Disorder Diagnoses (QEDD; Mintz et al, 1997) measures eating disorder symptoms based on DSM-IV-TR criteria; 1 question was changed (see italics) to reflect the reality that athletes exercise as a requirement for their sport (i.e., indicate the amount of time you spent exercising in addition to your normal sport practice in order to lose weight). Based on their responses, participants were classified as eating disordered (i.e., AN, BN, subthreshold BN, subthreshold AN, nonbingeing BN, and binge-eating disorder), symptomatic (i.e., some symptoms, but not sufficient to warrant a clinical diagnosis), or asymptomatic (i.e., no eating disturbances).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies limited to clinical settings may underestimate true prevalence and large scale, methodologically sound, population based studies are both timeconsuming and expensive 3 . Using questionnaires to assess eating disorders is linked to several potential methodological risks and therefore a two-stage approach using questionnaires for screening and interviews for final assessment is recommended 4,5 . Several broad studies on adolescent mental health have used questionnaire items derived from DSM-IV criteria to assess eating disorders 4 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using questionnaires to assess eating disorders is linked to several potential methodological risks and therefore a two-stage approach using questionnaires for screening and interviews for final assessment is recommended 4,5 . Several broad studies on adolescent mental health have used questionnaire items derived from DSM-IV criteria to assess eating disorders 4 . The validity of this approach has however not received enough attention, especially in the case of adolescents 5,6 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%