1992
DOI: 10.1016/0003-6870(92)90225-k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Questionnaire development: an examination of the Nordic Musculoskeletal questionnaire

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
150
0
19

Year Published

1997
1997
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 287 publications
(180 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
150
0
19
Order By: Relevance
“…Many researchers reported differences between self-reporting and observation of others in prevalence rates of WMSDs and physical work 5,39) , but others did not find such an effect 40) . In China, WMSDs are still not included as occupational diseases, and the awareness of WMSDs as an occupational injury is relatively low; so, theirs is no reporting bias, which may be influenced by reported discomfort.…”
Section: Limitations Of This Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers reported differences between self-reporting and observation of others in prevalence rates of WMSDs and physical work 5,39) , but others did not find such an effect 40) . In China, WMSDs are still not included as occupational diseases, and the awareness of WMSDs as an occupational injury is relatively low; so, theirs is no reporting bias, which may be influenced by reported discomfort.…”
Section: Limitations Of This Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The questionnaires were retrieved immediately after completion on the same day. The NMQ has been shown to be a valid and reliable instrument [26][27][28] . …”
Section: Subjects and Design Of Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Nordic questionnaire of musculoskeletal disorders was used because of its ease of use, high sensitivity (estimated between 82.3% and 100%) and specificity (82%) [11] [12]. Concerning Job Content Questionnaire, studies demonstrated satisfactory internal coherence, with Cronbach's alpha coefficients between 0.65 and 0.90 [13].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%