2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2016.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Questioning the visibility of the landscape learning process during the Paleoindian colonization of northeastern North America

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, cherts from both the MLF and Normanskill Group appear to co-occur in several fluted-point-period sites in the Northeast (Burke, 2006;Kitchel, 2018). When high-quality red and mottled red and green chert from the MLF was presumed to be unique in the Northeast, identifications of this material hundreds of kilometers from northern Maine were relatively uncontroversial.…”
Section: Group Membership Probabilities By Mahalanobis Distancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Additionally, cherts from both the MLF and Normanskill Group appear to co-occur in several fluted-point-period sites in the Northeast (Burke, 2006;Kitchel, 2018). When high-quality red and mottled red and green chert from the MLF was presumed to be unique in the Northeast, identifications of this material hundreds of kilometers from northern Maine were relatively uncontroversial.…”
Section: Group Membership Probabilities By Mahalanobis Distancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The area was first identified by archaeologists as an important source of chert for Indigenous peoples in the 1970s, when Bonnichsen and colleagues (1980) (Payne, 1987). Subsequent analyses (Burke, 2006;Burke et al, 2014;Kitchel, 2018;Pollock et al, 1999) (Kitchel et al, 2020). Outcroppings of red chert are recorded elsewhere within the MLF, including within several kilometers of Norway Bluff; however, these also lack associated evidence of precontact quarrying, and none show red and green mottling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In New England, the Mount Holly mammoth is currently the only example of a radiocarbon date for a proboscidean with a standard deviation less than 100 years that temporally overlaps with the widely accepted time frame for the dispersal of humans through the region around 12 800 cal. BP at the 2r level (Lothrop et al 2016: p. 205), although human groups were likely settled in the region somewhat before this date (Kitchel 2018). Outside of New England among a sample of 80 recent radiocarbon dates from proboscideans from New York and the upper Midwest (Feranec & Kozlowski 2012Widga et al 2020) the Mount Holly mammoth is one of only six examples to post-date~12 900 cal.…”
Section: Nitrogen Isotopesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kitchel (2016b) and Petersen (2004:xxvi–xxvii) propose that immigrant Paleoindian peoples explored the New England and Canadian Maritime parts of the Northeast quickly, perhaps in just a few generations. If correct, this would imply that most of the Northeast Paleoindian archaeological record reflects not landscape learning during colonization (e.g., Rockman and Steele 2003) but, rather, informed seasonal use of these landscapes after colonization (Bamforth 2014:40; Ellis 2011:398; Kilby 2014:216; Kitchel 2016b). For the archaeology of postcolonization settlement, LCP analysis can be used to project Paleoindian seasonal routes between toolstone sources and sites (e.g., Rademaker et al 2012; Robinson et al 2018).…”
Section: Least Cost Path Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%