2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2020.06.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Questioning the prognostic role of BAP-1 immunohistochemistry in malignant pleural mesothelioma: A single center experience with systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since IHC on tumor tissue does not help to distinguish between somatic and germline mutations, the clinic relevance of somatic BAP1 loss-of-function in MPM remains under debate, with conflicting reports that it may be associated with epithelioid subtype (19,30). In accordance with our previous meta-analysis, the significant association of BAP1 loss with OS found in MPM was lost in multivariate analysis showing that the histological subtype mainly affected the patient survival (31). We also confirmed that BAP1 loss is more frequent in epithelioid histotype, as previously observed (32)(33)(34).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Since IHC on tumor tissue does not help to distinguish between somatic and germline mutations, the clinic relevance of somatic BAP1 loss-of-function in MPM remains under debate, with conflicting reports that it may be associated with epithelioid subtype (19,30). In accordance with our previous meta-analysis, the significant association of BAP1 loss with OS found in MPM was lost in multivariate analysis showing that the histological subtype mainly affected the patient survival (31). We also confirmed that BAP1 loss is more frequent in epithelioid histotype, as previously observed (32)(33)(34).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Many studies have evaluated the correlation of BAP1 status by IHC and prognosis and have had mixed results, although most have found no significant association with survival after adjusting for known prognostic indicators. 4,16,18,25,[37][38][39][40] This lack of consistency may be due to many factors, including small number of patients, lack of validation, heterogeneity in patient selection, study size, patient management, and the adjustment, or lack thereof, within these studies for known prognostic indicators. In this study, we have revealed that BAP1 is a predictive marker in platinum and pemetrexed, nonsurgical PM patients in both the Danish and Australian cohorts, independent of other prognostic markers such as age, sex, ECOG PS, and histological subtype.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[20][21][22][23][24] Few studies have specifically evaluated the association of BAP1 IHC status with platinum and pemetrexed treatment. 14,25,26 On the basis of the biological function of BAP1 and longer survival in treated patients with BAP1 germline mutation, we postulated that loss of BAP1 in the tumor may predict survival after platinum and pemetrexed treatment in a general PM cohort.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A high-risk germline mutation in the BAP1 gene has been previously reported for MM, with somatic BAP1 mutations found to be latent in more than 20% of MM patients 11 , 12 . In addition to BAP1 loss 13 , MTAP (methylthioadenosine phosphorylase) loss help diagnose mesothelioma tumorigenesis 6 , 9 , 14 , 15 . NF2 has also been a target molecule for MM therapy 16 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%