2018
DOI: 10.1111/pirs.12250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Questioning territorial cohesion: (Un)equal access to services of general interest

Abstract: Although the debates about access to services of general interest have been at the core of the EU territorial cohesion discourse since the late 1990s, the impact of unequal accessibility to living conditions has yet be the subject of close inspection. The paper examines the relationship between the accessibility of services of general interest and demographic and socio‐economic conditions in a specific Czech region. The analysis reveals inter‐municipal disparities and identifies spatially excluded areas. Despi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the effects of public policies tend to cluster around specific physical locations [18], spatial fairness approaches are well-suited to assess such distributive effects [19]. Transport fairness influences many social aspects, such as territorial cohesion [20], the cost and time spent on daily commutes [21] and on public services [22]. Accessibility is, though imperfect, the most appropriate measure of benefits from transport infrastructure investments [23,24] and transport equity [6,17,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the effects of public policies tend to cluster around specific physical locations [18], spatial fairness approaches are well-suited to assess such distributive effects [19]. Transport fairness influences many social aspects, such as territorial cohesion [20], the cost and time spent on daily commutes [21] and on public services [22]. Accessibility is, though imperfect, the most appropriate measure of benefits from transport infrastructure investments [23,24] and transport equity [6,17,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… e problem perception index in municipalities around MTA Březina and MTA Libavá is statistically signifi -cantly lower.  e results refl ect regional socio-economic diff erences within the Czech Republic, or the long-term problems of structurally disabled regions and economically disadvantaged peripheral borderland areas (see e.g., Bański et al, 2018;Malý, 2016;Malý and Mulíček, 2016;Kebza, 2018;Vaishar et al, 2013).…”
Section: Positive and Negative Impacts Of Mta On Local Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certainly, local resilience is importantly affected by the accessibility to essential services (IFEL, 2015; Pezzi & Urso, 2017), which, indeed, represents a major source of concern within the EU territorial cohesion policy (Maly, 2018). Nevertheless, recent years have registered a loss of basic service in remote, small villages close to the regional borders (Lowe & Ward, 2009), suffering from orographic obstacles (Laner et al, 2019) and insufficient public transport connections (Maly, 2018), where residents are predominantly aged people (Christiaanse & Haartsen, 2017). This process has been caused by some interlinked policy and economic factors.…”
Section: The Resilience Of Border Regionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same applies to the phenomenon of the “ghost towns” in China and in other developing countries, cities recently built ex novo that remained completely or almost empty, or to the urban voids caused by location choices imposed by public authorities. Even though it is widely recognized that the provision of general services affects the quality of life and living conditions (Laner et al, 2019) representing one of the most significant sources of spatial inequality (Maly, 2018), its impact on local resilience must be assessed along with other factors. Service accessibility, in fact, is necessary, but not in itself sufficient to increase attractiveness of peripheral areas.…”
Section: The Resilience Of Border Regionsmentioning
confidence: 99%