2020
DOI: 10.1177/1468794120914522
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Questioning identities/shifting identities: the impact of researching sex and gender on a researcher’s LGBT+ identity

Abstract: This article explores the role of reflexivity, emotion work and insider/outsider researcher status in one queer researcher’s experiences of conducting fieldwork. Through exploring field diaries and interview extracts, this article highlights the impact of being/researching LGBT+ identities as a queer researcher. Five experiences are discussed: (i) the euphoria of connection, (ii) relationships with participants, (iii) retraumatisation through listening, (iv) finding oneself on the outside and (v) the researche… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The struggles in the production of knowledge about LGBTQI accountants had the potential to conflate with our emotional journeys and potential vulnerability as LGBTQIidentifying researchers. We thus engaged in a reflexive journey which further helped to explore the narrative around being and working as LGBTQI (Nelson, 2020). This connection with the participants' stories also led to retraumatisation of personal experiences and deep connection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The struggles in the production of knowledge about LGBTQI accountants had the potential to conflate with our emotional journeys and potential vulnerability as LGBTQIidentifying researchers. We thus engaged in a reflexive journey which further helped to explore the narrative around being and working as LGBTQI (Nelson, 2020). This connection with the participants' stories also led to retraumatisation of personal experiences and deep connection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This emotional context can be even more acute when working with vulnerable and marginalised communities, where pain creates layers of intensity and ‘affective immersion’ (Henriksen and Schliehe, 2020: 842; Nelson, 2020; Federman et al, 2016). This context requires researchers to be highly present and empathic, ‘to pick up on slight changes in tonality, bodily unrest, (in) assertive voices, the materiality of the room, sounds, disruptions’ (Henriksen and Schliehe, 2020: 842).…”
Section: What To Do About How We Feelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participant observers are behaving as part of communities in which they are not authentic members and spending significant time with individuals who by definition are research participants, not friends. Or they may be working in their own communities and navigating the difficult insider dynamics of conducting research on those who are their friends and acquaintances in their personal lives (Guevarra 2006;Nelson 2020;Owton and Allen-Collinson 2014;Taylor 2011). Ethnographers are often the keepers of sensitive and sometimes traumatic stories, and may witness firsthand traumatic or emotionally distressing events (Bahn and Weatherill 2013;Campbell 2002;Hedican 2006;Pieke 1995;Vanderstaay 2005).…”
Section: Competency Six-boundaries and Self-carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These boundaries can include physical limits on where a researcher will meet with participants (i.e., keeping an office door cracked, or being aware of increased risk in certain private locations) and symbolic borders such as imagining an emotional wall erected to ensure the investigator is not taking on participants’ emotional states. Boundaries serve to clarify the professional relationship between the investigator and participant and to reduce risks of vicarious trauma after hearing disturbing stories (Bergman Blix and Wettergren 2015; Connolly and Reilly 2007; Johnson and Clarke 2003; Keyel 2021[2020]; Kiyimba and O’Reilly 2016; Nelson 2020; Shaw et al 2020). Furthermore, maintaining boundaries between their personal and professional lives can help investigators avoid burnout and emotional enmeshment with participants.…”
Section: Competencies For Trauma and Justice-informed Ethnographymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation