Question dependency in terms of compliance and erotetic implication

Łupkowski, Paweł

doi:10.12775/llp.2015.002

Cited by 3 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…What is more, [37] introduces certain well-defined operations on e-scenarios which allows the merging of two e-scenarios or to contract a given part of escenario. They prove also useful as a normative yardstick for empirical research (like the one based on the corpus study data [11,12,13]; Games With a Purpose [14,16]; and the psychometric tool named Erotetic Reasoning Test [28,29]).…”

Section: Erotetic Search Scenariosmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…With time, such an approach will promote cooperative agents from a group of information sources. 11 Notice that the proposed measure may also be interpreted along the lines of the agents being well-informed to different degrees, as an agent may offer the A answer due to non-cooperativeness as well as a simple lack of certain information. We could also refine the system by adding further points for agents who contributed to obtaining certain solutions to the initial problem.…”

Section: Dl(iel) Mult Examplementioning

confidence: 99%

“…In our case, we use the framework of formal dialogue systems, which is mainly inspired by [1,8]. 3 The DL(IEL) mult system (firstly presented in [11]) is used here as an over-layer for IEL concepts and allows for expressing the dynamics of the information exchange. On the other hand, IEL is used as an underpinning of a formal dialogue system in order to check the validity (or justification) of certain dialogue moves.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…2 See [35,27,10,11,29], and the overview in Section 2.2. 3 It is worth mentioning that [15] presents an early approach to the epistemic version of e-scenarios (for one questioning agent).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Managing Multiple Information Sources for a Questioning Agenda

Łupkowski,

Urbański

2024

LLP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this paper, we consider how an agent may manage a questioning agenda in a situation where multiple information sources are available. We work within the framework of formal dialogue systems with the underpinning of Inferential Erotetic Logic. Firstly, we present the formal dialogue system DL(IEL)mult for managing multi-agent information retrieval. Then, we extend the proposed system so that it is capable of representing group and individual levels for the question decomposition process. We also propose two measures for evaluating information sources: their cooperativeness and success levels; next, we analyse how the choice of agents may influence the way in which a solution for a given problem is reached.

show abstract

Section: Erotetic Search Scenariosmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Dl(iel) Mult Examplementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…2 See [35,27,10,11,29], and the overview in Section 2.2. 3 It is worth mentioning that [15] presents an early approach to the epistemic version of e-scenarios (for one questioning agent).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Managing Multiple Information Sources for a Questioning Agenda

Łupkowski,

Urbański

2024

LLP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Finally, connections between the various paradigms in the logic of questions are examined in: (Hamami 2015, Łupkowski 2015, Wiśniewski 2017, Wiśniewski & Leszczyńska-Jasion 2015.…”

Section: Structural Rules: Weakening As Reducing Information Noise Co...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Asking and Answering. Rivalling Approaches to Interrogative Methods

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Erotetic Search Scenarios and Three-Valued Logic

Leszczyńska-Jasion

Łupkowski

2015

J of Log Lang and Inf

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Our aim is to model the behaviour of a cognitive agent trying to solve a complex problem by dividing it into sub-problems, but failing to solve some of these sub-problems. We use the powerful framework of erotetic search scenarios (ESS) combined with Kleene's strong three-valued logic. ESS, defined on the grounds of Inferential Erotetic Logic, has appeared to be a useful logical tool for modelling cognitive goal-directed processes. Using the logical tools of ESS and the three-valued logic, we will show how an agent could solve the initial problem despite the fact that the sub-problems remain unsolved. Thus our model not only indicates missing information but also specifies the contexts in which the problem-solving process may end in success despite the lack of information. We will also show that this model of problem solving may find use in an analysis of natural language dialogues.

show abstract

Question dependency in terms of compliance and erotetic implication

Cited by 3 publications

References 6 publications

Managing Multiple Information Sources for a Questioning Agenda

Managing Multiple Information Sources for a Questioning Agenda

Asking and Answering. Rivalling Approaches to Interrogative Methods

Erotetic Search Scenarios and Three-Valued Logic

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About