2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtchem.2020.100326
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quest to enhance up-conversion efficiency: a comparison of anhydrous vs. hydrous synthesis of NaGdF4: Yb3+ and Tm3+ nanoparticles

Abstract: A major challenge in the field of up-converting (UC) nanomaterials is to enhance their efficiencies. The-OH defects on the surface of the nanoparticles are thought to be the main cause of luminescence quenching, but there are no comparative studies in the literature showing the impact of anhydrous versus hydrous synthesis on up-conversion efficiency. In this article, we present the synthesis of up-converting NaGdF4: Yb +3 , Tm +3 nanoparticles by two different methods: Thermal decomposition of single source me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(48 reference statements)
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When focusing on the NIR 3 H 4 → 3 H 6 transition, the observed quantum yield varies from 0.06 to 0.88% in the studied power density range, following an apparent power function trend. These values are comparable to other Yb 3+ - and Tm 3+ -doped systems under the same excitation conditions, despite the smaller nanoparticle size and the absence of additional nanoparticle shell or functionality, which speaks of its improved efficiency over other hosts. , The blue 1 G 4 → 3 H 6 emission has an observed quantum yield of 3.4 × 10 –6 –1.8 × 10 –4 . At the lowest 0.3 W/cm 2 , this is substantially less efficient than other studied compositions; however, at the highest studied power of 4.8 W/cm 2 , these nanoparticles show an improved quantum yield. , By preventing the population of the 1 D 2 excited state in the BaYF 5 host, higher excitation powers are substantially contributing to the population of the 1 G 4 state, which explains the variability in quantum yield, further proving the previously discussed mechanisms.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When focusing on the NIR 3 H 4 → 3 H 6 transition, the observed quantum yield varies from 0.06 to 0.88% in the studied power density range, following an apparent power function trend. These values are comparable to other Yb 3+ - and Tm 3+ -doped systems under the same excitation conditions, despite the smaller nanoparticle size and the absence of additional nanoparticle shell or functionality, which speaks of its improved efficiency over other hosts. , The blue 1 G 4 → 3 H 6 emission has an observed quantum yield of 3.4 × 10 –6 –1.8 × 10 –4 . At the lowest 0.3 W/cm 2 , this is substantially less efficient than other studied compositions; however, at the highest studied power of 4.8 W/cm 2 , these nanoparticles show an improved quantum yield. , By preventing the population of the 1 D 2 excited state in the BaYF 5 host, higher excitation powers are substantially contributing to the population of the 1 G 4 state, which explains the variability in quantum yield, further proving the previously discussed mechanisms.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…At the lowest 0.3 W/cm 2 , this is substantially less efficient than other studied compositions; however, at the highest studied power of 4.8 W/cm 2 , these nanoparticles show an improved quantum yield. 5,38 By preventing the population of the 1 D 2 excited state in the BaYF 5 host, higher excitation powers are substantially contributing to the population of the 1 G 4 state, which explains the variability in quantum yield, further proving the previously discussed mechanisms.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…For example, emission quenching due to the concentration of Ln, the surface of the NPs, the thermal effects, or the presence of OH can significantly reduce the intensity of the emission. Laser power density can also affect the intensity of the luminescence by interfering with the population of electrons in the excited state of the Ln ions. In addition to radiative relaxations, some of the energy is converted to heat by nonradiative relaxation pathways. In the upconversion process, the quantum yield is always low compared to other excitation processes because of the important nonradiative relaxation . Therefore, this heat can be significant and then affects the temperature measurement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…42−45 In the upconversion process, the quantum yield is always low compared to other excitation processes because of the important nonradiative relaxation. 46 Therefore, this heat can be significant and then affects the temperature measurement. In a nonlinear optical process, the heating depends on the power density of the laser.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have thus focused on the synthesis of smaller UCNPs with intense emission without any intermediate passivation layer such as silica or an undoped matrix. Our synthesis requires thus appropriately designed anhydrous molecular precursors as a synthetic strategy to minimize −OH functionality on the surface as well as in the volume of the NPs. Indeed, it has been shown recently that, like surface hydroxyl groups, the internal hydroxyl impurity too has a detrimental effect on the upconversion efficiency . The NaGdF 4 -based UCNPs prepared using this strategy showed a much higher upconversion intensity in comparison to NPs of a similar composition produced from hydrated inorganic salts .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%