Proceedings of the 14th ACM / IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM) 2020
DOI: 10.1145/3382494.3410694
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quest for the Golden Approach

Abstract: Background: Given the invisibility and unpredictability of distributed crowdtesting processes, there is a large number of duplicate reports, and detecting these duplicate reports is an important task to help save testing effort. Although, many approaches have been proposed to automatically detect the duplicates, the comparison among them and the practical guidelines to adopt these approaches in crowdtesting remain vague. Aims: We aim at conducting the first experimental evaluation of the commonly-used and stat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the research mentioned above on methodological proposals, Huang et al [29] conducted the first experimental evaluation of 10 duplicate crowdsourced test report detection methods to explore which is the golden method. The results show that ML-REP, a machine learning-based approach, and DL-BiMPM, a deep learningbased method, are the best; however, the latter is more sensitive to training data quantity and takes longer to train and predict.…”
Section: Duplicate Crowdsourced Test Report Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the research mentioned above on methodological proposals, Huang et al [29] conducted the first experimental evaluation of 10 duplicate crowdsourced test report detection methods to explore which is the golden method. The results show that ML-REP, a machine learning-based approach, and DL-BiMPM, a deep learningbased method, are the best; however, the latter is more sensitive to training data quantity and takes longer to train and predict.…”
Section: Duplicate Crowdsourced Test Report Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cooper et al [23] proposed a video-based duplicate detection method named TANGO that combines computer vision, optical character recognition, and text retrieval methods. Huang et al [24] conducted an empirical evaluation of 10 commonly used state-of-the-art duplicate detection methods. They found that machine learning-based methods, i.e., ML-REP, and deep learning-based methods, i.e., DL-BiMPM, are the best two methods; the latter is sensitive to the size of the training data.…”
Section: Duplicate Crowdsourced Test Report Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%