Proceedings of the 2014 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data 2014
DOI: 10.1145/2588555.2610495
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Querying k-truss community in large and dynamic graphs

Abstract: Community detection which discovers densely connected structures in a network has been studied a lot. In this paper, we study online community search which is practically useful but less studied in the literature. Given a query vertex in a graph, the problem is to find meaningful communities that the vertex belongs to in an online manner. We propose a novel community model based on the k-truss concept, which brings nice structural and computational properties. We design a compact and elegant index structure wh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
283
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 388 publications
(289 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
283
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, we also conduct comprehensive case studies on a coauthorship network to evaluate the effectiveness of the k-influential community model. The results demonstrate that using our community model is capable of finding meaningful influential communities in a network, which can not be identified by using the k-truss community model [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, we also conduct comprehensive case studies on a coauthorship network to evaluate the effectiveness of the k-influential community model. The results demonstrate that using our community model is capable of finding meaningful influential communities in a network, which can not be identified by using the k-truss community model [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Here we compare the proposed community model with the truss community model [15], which is successfully applied to find query-dependent cohesive communities in a large network. For a fair comparison, we compare the k-influential community with the k + 1 truss community.…”
Section: Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On R-MAT graphs, the number of vertices is set to be 5000 and the edge-to-vertex ratio varies from 40 to 140. On SSCA graphs, the number of vertices is set to be 2 20 and the size of the maximum clique varies from 100 to 200.…”
Section: On Synthetic Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Orthogonal to our work, many works extended the definition of clique to other dense subgraph structures (e.g., maximal cliques in an uncertain graph [42], cross-graph quasi-cliques [21], k-truss [20], and densest-subgraph [35]), and studied their applications. The existing algorithms for these problem are centralized.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, social community and collaboration circle require the cohesion to be persistent, or robust, regardless of the size of the subgraph. There are many definitions for dense subgraphs, e.g., densest subgraph [20], kPlex, quasi-clique, k-Core [11] and k-Truss [10]. Of these, only for λ-quasi-cliques, the cohesion is always at least λ as the subgraph size changes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%