2010
DOI: 10.1209/0295-5075/89/67001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quenching through Dirac and semi-Dirac points in optical lattices: Kibble-Zurek scaling for anisotropic quantum critical systems

Abstract: We propose that Kibble-Zurek scaling can be studied in optical lattices by creating geometries that support, Dirac, Semi-Dirac and Quadratic Band Crossings. On a Honeycomb lattice with fermions, as a staggered on-site potential is varied through zero, the system crosses the gapless Dirac points, and we show that the density of defects created scales as 1/τ , where τ is the inverse rate of change of the potential, in agreement with the Kibble-Zurek relation. We generalize the result for a passage through a semi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(99 reference statements)
1
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The KZ argument predicts that the scaling of the defect density (n) in the final state is universal and is given by n ∼ 1/τ νd/(νz+1) where τ is the inverse rate of driving across a QCP with the correlation length and dynamical exponents ν and z, respectively, and d is the spatial dimension. The possibility of the experimental verification of Kibble-Zurek scaling (KZS) in a spin-1 Bose condensate [16], in ions trapped in optical lattices [17,18], and also in ultracold fermionic atoms in optical lattices [19,20] has paved the way for the above mentioned theoretical studies.Although, the KZS for quenching through a quantum critical point is well-understood; the scaling of the defect density following an adiabatic quantum quench across a quantum multicritical point (MCP) is relatively less studied. A non-KZS behavior (n ∼ 1/τ 1/6 ) of the density of defects (wrongly oriented spins) for quenching across the MCP of the spin-1/2 transverse XY chain was reported for the first time in reference [8] which was later explained in reference [21] introducing an effective dynamical exponent z 2 (= 3) for Jordan-Wigner solvable spin chains [22] reducible to a collection of decoupled two-level systems in the Fourier space and applying Landau-Zener (LZ) transition formula [23].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The KZ argument predicts that the scaling of the defect density (n) in the final state is universal and is given by n ∼ 1/τ νd/(νz+1) where τ is the inverse rate of driving across a QCP with the correlation length and dynamical exponents ν and z, respectively, and d is the spatial dimension. The possibility of the experimental verification of Kibble-Zurek scaling (KZS) in a spin-1 Bose condensate [16], in ions trapped in optical lattices [17,18], and also in ultracold fermionic atoms in optical lattices [19,20] has paved the way for the above mentioned theoretical studies.Although, the KZS for quenching through a quantum critical point is well-understood; the scaling of the defect density following an adiabatic quantum quench across a quantum multicritical point (MCP) is relatively less studied. A non-KZS behavior (n ∼ 1/τ 1/6 ) of the density of defects (wrongly oriented spins) for quenching across the MCP of the spin-1/2 transverse XY chain was reported for the first time in reference [8] which was later explained in reference [21] introducing an effective dynamical exponent z 2 (= 3) for Jordan-Wigner solvable spin chains [22] reducible to a collection of decoupled two-level systems in the Fourier space and applying Landau-Zener (LZ) transition formula [23].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The KZ argument predicts that the scaling of the defect density (n) in the final state is universal and is given by n ∼ 1/τ νd/(νz+1) where τ is the inverse rate of driving across a QCP with the correlation length and dynamical exponents ν and z, respectively, and d is the spatial dimension. The possibility of the experimental verification of Kibble-Zurek scaling (KZS) in a spin-1 Bose condensate [16], in ions trapped in optical lattices [17,18], and also in ultracold fermionic atoms in optical lattices [19,20] has paved the way for the above mentioned theoretical studies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The edge states in a 2D topological insulator are described by an effective 1D Dirac Hamiltonian, whereas its bulk states are described by a 2D Dirac Hamiltonian and the QCP separating the gapped to gapless phases is a 2D massless Dirac point. These models have turned out to be immensely useful in the studies of the Kibble-Zurek scaling 43 , sudden quenches 44,45 , fidelity susceptibility and thermodynamic fidelity 46 , Loschmidt echo 47 and periodic steady state reached through a sinusoidal variation of the mass term 48 . Considering the massive 2D Dirac Hamiltonian one can rescale the units appropriately to obtain the 2 × 2 Hamiltonian describing the system close to a single valley as,…”
Section: Scaling In Dirac Hamiltonians and Role Of Marginalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Azonban a legkisebb energia különbség (legkisebb gap) nullához tart, ahogy a rendszer közelít a fázisátalakulási ponthoz,így a külső paraméter változása nem lesz a folyamat egész ideje alatt "elég lassú". A kérdés, hogy milyen messze lesz a lassú dinamikával kapottállapot az alapállapottól a fázisátalakulási pont keresztezése után, intenzív vizsgálatok tárgyát képezte [50,56,[58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74]. Kibbleés Zurek [58] [59] megadott egyösszefüggést, amely a kétállapot "távolságát" a P (τ ) ∼ (density of deffects)…”
Section: Bevezetésunclassified
“…However when the system reaches the critical point, the smallest gap goes to zero, and the variation of the Hamiltonian cannot be slow enough to remain in the instantaneous ground state. The question, how far is the described system from the instantaneous ground state, is target of extensive investigations in the literature [50,56,[58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%