1998
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.80.5105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quenching of the Size Effects in Free and Matrix-Embedded Silver Clusters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
118
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
118
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While for metals that are well described by the jellium model, like for example sodium, the screening charges are located at approximately at 1Å outside the jellium edge (i.e. δ 1Å), for silver and gold, experimental data [32][33][34] seems to suggest that the effect of inner electrons is to push the reach of 5-s (free) electron peak density inside the jellium edge 21 . This would correspond in our model to an overlap of the free and bound electron surfaces (δ 0).…”
Section: Classical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While for metals that are well described by the jellium model, like for example sodium, the screening charges are located at approximately at 1Å outside the jellium edge (i.e. δ 1Å), for silver and gold, experimental data [32][33][34] seems to suggest that the effect of inner electrons is to push the reach of 5-s (free) electron peak density inside the jellium edge 21 . This would correspond in our model to an overlap of the free and bound electron surfaces (δ 0).…”
Section: Classical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…core [21][22][23]. These effects lead to a reduction of the local values of n e and d , respectively, and thus of the screening of the electron-ion interaction.…”
Section: P H Y S I C a L R E V I E W L E T T E R S Week Ending 2 May mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the bulk material results for the e-ph coupling rate [Eqs. (2) and (3)] and spatially averaging it over the nanoparticle volume using the known parameters for the spillout and d-electron localization effects [21][22][23], a large increase of the average scattering rates is computed in small clusters (Fig. 2).…”
Section: P H Y S I C a L R E V I E W L E T T E R S Week Ending 2 May mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the free-electron Na surface, the screening charges are located at approximately 0.9 Å (3 Å ) outside the jellium edge (surface atomic layer), meaning that for a Na-Na junction, the effective junction width obtained from matching the measured DP frequency with local classical Drude calculations would be 1.8 Å (6 Å ) smaller than the actual separation between the jellium edges (surface atomic planes). For silver and gold, an analysis of the data on the blueshift of the dipole plasmon resonance in small clusters [9,27,34,44] using Eq. (1) places the effective screening charges inside the jellium edge at 0.8-1.5 Å .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%