2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.astropartphys.2019.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quenching factor measurement for NaI(Tl) scintillation crystal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
52
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
5
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This calibration setup was utilized in [6] to observe a monotonically decreasing QF with decreasing Na recoil energy in NaI[Tl], a trend at the time in tension with previous measurements. This behavior was later confirmed in four independent experiments [10][11][12][13].…”
Section: New Measurement Of the Quenching Factor For Csi[na]mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…This calibration setup was utilized in [6] to observe a monotonically decreasing QF with decreasing Na recoil energy in NaI[Tl], a trend at the time in tension with previous measurements. This behavior was later confirmed in four independent experiments [10][11][12][13].…”
Section: New Measurement Of the Quenching Factor For Csi[na]mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…It is worth noting that recently Ref. [45] gave quenching factors for a small COSINE-100 like detector; in particular: Na quenching factor ranging from 0.1 to 0.23 with a significant energy dependence, and I quenching factor ranging from 0.04 to 0.06 were reported; a very high precision is quoted. However, these values cannot be consistently considered for other detectors because of the above mentioned arguments; in particular, those crystals have been grown by different technique and protocols than those of DAMA/LIBRA.…”
Section: The Case Of Dm Particles Inducing Nuclear Recoilsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…They are related by E ee = QE r , where Q is the quenching factor. DAMA/LIBRA have historically used the values Q = 0.3 and 0.09 for Na and I respectively [176], but we use the lower value Q = 0.1 for Na to reflect more recent measurements [177]. To account for the finite PMT resolution, we convolve Figure. The left-hand column shows the calculation ignoring gravitational focusing whereas the middle column shows the non-sinusoidal modifications that it gives rise to when it is included.…”
Section: A Modulation Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%