Encyclopedia of Iron, Steel, and Their Alloys 2016
DOI: 10.1081/e-eisa-120048784
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quench Factor Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a comparison with other studies, it is obvious in the figure that the time to reach 200°C for the COTMP ester is 20.9 s, which is lower than soybean oil (24 s) and palm oil (24 s) according to Komatsu et al, [ 52 ] and hydrogen‐winterized soybean oil (27.5 s) according to Totten et al [ 53 ] In another study, Otero et al [ 54 ] investigated the quenching performance of different bioquenchants at 60°C bath temperature. The rate of cooling at 300°C in their study is between 8.18 to 19.31°C/s, which is lower than the rate of cooling with the COTMP ester (42°C/s).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…As a comparison with other studies, it is obvious in the figure that the time to reach 200°C for the COTMP ester is 20.9 s, which is lower than soybean oil (24 s) and palm oil (24 s) according to Komatsu et al, [ 52 ] and hydrogen‐winterized soybean oil (27.5 s) according to Totten et al [ 53 ] In another study, Otero et al [ 54 ] investigated the quenching performance of different bioquenchants at 60°C bath temperature. The rate of cooling at 300°C in their study is between 8.18 to 19.31°C/s, which is lower than the rate of cooling with the COTMP ester (42°C/s).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%