2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2022.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quelles sont les pratiques en génétique des pédiatres onco-hématologues de la SFCE ? Une enquête du groupe socle éthique CONECT-AML

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Parents and children should be able to express their perspectives on being informed about various types of results, including those relevant for their cancer, those that may be linked to their cancer, as well as medically actionable incidental findings. It is also important that healthcare professionals and researchers appropriately interpret significance of findings reported in studies and their possible limitations to appropriately translate knowledge in clinical practice 52–54 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Parents and children should be able to express their perspectives on being informed about various types of results, including those relevant for their cancer, those that may be linked to their cancer, as well as medically actionable incidental findings. It is also important that healthcare professionals and researchers appropriately interpret significance of findings reported in studies and their possible limitations to appropriately translate knowledge in clinical practice 52–54 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also important that healthcare professionals and researchers appropriately interpret significance of findings reported in studies and their possible limitations to appropriately translate knowledge in clinical practice. [52][53][54] Of note, three patients with FP-ARMS had germline P/LP RET variants, two of whom had moderate-to high-risk RET variants and phenotypes compatible with MEN2. 28,33,37 Crawford et al, reporting on one of these patients (RET p.C634F), conducted functional analyses allowing them to hypothesize that the germline RET variant was not biologically relevant in this patient.…”
Section: Nb Patients With Arms and Fusion Positivementioning
confidence: 99%