Gay Latino Studies 2011
DOI: 10.1215/9780822393856-002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Queer Theory Revisited

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our formulation of “a queer sociology” provides a framework that draws on fields of study that were minimized, if not entirely ignored, by the two moments we outline. One, they do not recognize queer theory’s multiple and parallel genealogies (Hames‐Garcia 2011). Two, they do not acknowledge the extent to which Black feminist thought and women of color feminisms (see, for instance, Collins 1988, 1990; Combahee River Collective 1977; Crenshaw 1989; Lorde 1984; Moraga and Anzaldúa 1983) influenced queer theory (Guzmán 2006; Haritaworn 2015; Ferguson 2004; Saunders 2015).…”
Section: Discussion: Expanding Queer Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our formulation of “a queer sociology” provides a framework that draws on fields of study that were minimized, if not entirely ignored, by the two moments we outline. One, they do not recognize queer theory’s multiple and parallel genealogies (Hames‐Garcia 2011). Two, they do not acknowledge the extent to which Black feminist thought and women of color feminisms (see, for instance, Collins 1988, 1990; Combahee River Collective 1977; Crenshaw 1989; Lorde 1984; Moraga and Anzaldúa 1983) influenced queer theory (Guzmán 2006; Haritaworn 2015; Ferguson 2004; Saunders 2015).…”
Section: Discussion: Expanding Queer Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moving through these domains in an analytical way may reveal systemic structures that are overlooked when only categorical variables are considered, and this “recognition of intersection in multiple domains may reveal additional options for non-tradition coalition building among groups” (p. 74). This stance offers a method for studying gay families and proffers a response to a frequent critique of queer scholarship: “one might ask whether queer always subverts other identities, or whether it sometimes just hides them” (Hames-García, 2011: 35). Intersectionality may expand the scope of conversations about and the working definitions of diverse families.…”
Section: Intersectionality and Intersectional Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is echoed by Muñoz (2009) and Hames-García (2011), two scholars who identify both as queer and as of color and whose scholarship has worked to expand the boundaries of queer theory and integrate issues surrounding race and class so that queer scholarship reflects the lived experiences of a broader and more representative populations.…”
Section: Intersectionality and Intersectional Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bersani, 2010; Butler, 1990, 2004; Dean, 2000; Rubin, 2011). However, one must only look to the responses of many queers of colour and poor queers (Cohen, 1997; Eng, 2010; Hames-Garcia, 2011; Hollinbaugh, 2001; Hong and Ferguson, 2011; Johnson, 2005; Muñoz, 2009; Shah, 2005) to see a long history of a critique of this position. These scholars argue that, while identity might be fraught, it is deeply powerful.…”
Section: Happy Identities and Polyamorous Queersmentioning
confidence: 99%