Queer Theory and Native Studies

Abstract

Queer studies highlights the importance of developing analyses that go beyond identity and representational politics. For Native studies in particular, queer theory points to the possibility of going beyond representing the voices of Native peoples, a project that can quickly become co-opted into providing Native commodities for consumption in the multicultural academic-industrial complex. The subjectless critique of queer theory can assist Native studies in critically interrogating how it could unwittingly re-create colonial hierarchies even within projects of decolonization. This critique also sheds light on how Native peoples function within the colonial imaginary—including the colonial imaginary of scholars and movements that claim to be radical. At the same time, Native studies can build on queer of color critique's engagement with subjectless critique. In the move to go “postidentity,” queer theory often reinstantiates a white supremacist, settler colonialism by disappearing the indigenous peoples colonized in this land who become the foils for the emergence of postcolonial, postmodern, diasporic, and queer subjects. With respect to Native studies, even queer of color critique does not necessarily mark how identities are shaped by settler colonialism. Thus a conversation between Native studies and queer theory is important, because the logics of settler colonialism and decolonization must be queered in order to properly speak to the genocidal present that not only continues to disappear indigenous peoples but reinforces the structures of white supremacy, settler colonialism, and heteropatriarchy that affect all peoples.

Race Relations and Racism in the LGBTQ Community of Toronto: Perceptions of Gay and Queer Social Service Providers of Color

“…My intervention is to make visible how queers are settlers (A. Smith, 2010) and to recognize settler colonialism, which acts to make Indigenous self-determination and sovereignty invisible.…”

Unsettling care: Troubling transnational itineraries of care in feminist health practices

“…No one is innocent, and all entwined. Scholars of decolonization such as Andrea Smith and Eve Tuck show how a politics of unsettling challenges conventional feminist and queer affective formulations of belonging, inclusion, healing, confession, ownership, and solidarity as caught up in the logics of settler colonialism (Arvin et al, 2013;Million, 2013;Morgensen, 2011;Smith, 2010;Tuck and Yang, 2012). Unsettling the politics of care, then, requires further thinking about the political and affective dimensions of Donna Haraway's (2010) call to 'stay with the trouble'.…”

Speaking of Opium: Ownership and (Settler) Colonial Dispossession

“…I echo Andrea Smith's concern that 'Native Studies is often ethnographically entrapped within the project of studying the Natives'. 34 If decolonisation is indeed the project of settler colonial and native studies, it is necessary to widen the scope of native studies through an acknowledgment that settler colonialism is not only a phenomenon that is harmful to native people, but to all people.…”