2017
DOI: 10.1186/s13321-017-0211-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

QuBiLS-MAS, open source multi-platform software for atom- and bond-based topological (2D) and chiral (2.5D) algebraic molecular descriptors computations

Abstract: Background In previous reports, Marrero-Ponce et al. proposed algebraic formalisms for characterizing topological (2D) and chiral (2.5D) molecular features through atom- and bond-based ToMoCoMD-CARDD (acronym for Topological Molecular Computational Design-Computer Aided Rational Drug Design) molecular descriptors. These MDs codify molecular information based on the bilinear, quadratic and linear algebraic forms and the graph-theoretical electronic-density and edge-adjacency matrices in order to consider atom- … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
60
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same time, this cut-off prevents excessive imbalance between active and inactive compounds. The software QUBILs-MAS v1.0 [30] was employed to calculate the molecular descriptors known as the atom-based quadratic indices, which have been earlier proved to be highly efficient for developing mt-QSAR models [27,31,32,33,34,35]. A detailed description of how these descriptors are calculated is provided in the Materials and Methods section.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, this cut-off prevents excessive imbalance between active and inactive compounds. The software QUBILs-MAS v1.0 [30] was employed to calculate the molecular descriptors known as the atom-based quadratic indices, which have been earlier proved to be highly efficient for developing mt-QSAR models [27,31,32,33,34,35]. A detailed description of how these descriptors are calculated is provided in the Materials and Methods section.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several weighted MDs can be calculated from these previous definitions, for instance: (1) from FMDCμ1 for α′ = λ′ =1, the weighted DIVATI 2D‐MDs, the weighted GT‐STAF 2D‐MDs and the weighted atom‐based QuBiLS‐MAS 2D‐MDs can be obtained, when vector L is computed with some of these families; (2) if vector L is computed with the vertex degree invariant, then from FMDCμ1 for α′ =1 and λ′ =2, from FMDCμ4 for α′ = λ′ =1, and from FMDCμ4 for α′ =1 and λ′ =−1/2, the weighted first Zagreb index, the weighted second Zagreb index and the weighted Randic connectivity index can be calculated, respectively; (3) from FMDCμ4 for α'=BC+1 (B is the number of edges and C is the number of rings) and λ′ =−1/2, weighted Balaban‐like indices can be determined; (4) from FMDCμ6 for α′ =1 and λ′ =−1/2, weighted Kier‐Hall connectivity indices can be obtained; and (5) from FMDCμ7 , weighted autocorrelation descriptors can be computed. Below, a practical example is presented.…”
Section: Extending Several Traditional Procedures To Derive Gowawa Opmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From these fuzzy formulations, several specific descriptors can be computed, for instance: (1) from for , fuzzy DIVATI MDs [41], fuzzy GT-STAF MDs [34] and fuzzy QuBiLS-MAS MDs [37] can be obtained, when the LOVIs vector is computed with some of those families; (2) if vector is computed with the vertex degree invariant, then from for and , from for and from for and , the fuzzy first Zagreb index [65], the fuzzy second Zagreb index [65] and the fuzzy Randic connectivity index [68] can be obtained, respectively; (3) from for (B is the number of graph edges (covalent edges) and C is the number of rings) and , the fuzzy Balaban-like indices can be determined [32]; (4) from for and , the fuzzy Kier–Hall connectivity indices can be obtained [69]; and (5) from , fuzzy autocorrelation MDs can be computed. A practical example is presented below.…”
Section: Extending Traditional Functions To Derive Choquet Integral-bmentioning
confidence: 99%