2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2104.01716
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quaternion Factorization Machines: A Lightweight Solution to Intricate Feature Interaction Modelling

Abstract: Due to the sparsity of available features in web-scale predictive analytics, combinatorial features become a crucial means for deriving accurate predictions. As a well-established approach, factorization machine (FM) is capable of automatically learning high-order interactions among features to make predictions without the need for manual feature engineering. With the prominent development of deep neural networks (DNNs), there is a recent and ongoing trend of enhancing the expressiveness of FM-based models wit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(7 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(102 reference statements)
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, QNFM outperforms QFM in most cases. Such results are consistent with prior studies [6,14], indicating the power of deep learning techniques in recommender systems.…”
Section: Performance Comparisonsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Besides, QNFM outperforms QFM in most cases. Such results are consistent with prior studies [6,14], indicating the power of deep learning techniques in recommender systems.…”
Section: Performance Comparisonsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…sedenions S ∈ H 16 , and trigintaduonions T ∈ H 32 . To verify the performance of CDRec, we compare it with the following methods, covering the classical models (MF [17], DMF [39], and NeuCF [14]), the GCN-based models (GCMC [3], NGCF [38], LightGCN [11], and BiGI [4]), and the hypercomplex-valued models (CCF [42], QCF [42], QFM [6], QNFM [6], and QGNN [23]). The characteristics of the comparison methods are included in supplement C.2.…”
Section: Comparison Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations