1999
DOI: 10.1111/j.1502-3885.1999.tb00227.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quaternary records of the dire wolf, Canis dirus, in North and South America

Abstract: Quaternary records of the dire wolf, Cunis dirus, in North and South America ROBERT G. DUNDAS Dundas, R. G. 1999 (September): Quaternary records of the dire wolf, Canis dirus, in North and South America. Boreas, VOI. 28, pp. 375-385. OS~O. ISSN 0300-9483. The dire wolf was an important large, late Pleistocene predator in North and South America, well adapted to preying on megaherbivores. Geographically widespread, Canis dirus is reported from 136 localities in North America from Alberta, Canada, southward and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
29
0
6

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
5
29
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Biknevicius & Van Valkenburgh (1996, p. 419) presented a compelling summary of the feeding behavior of dire wolves: ‘… like gray wolves and unlike hyaenas, dire wolves probably used their postcarnassial molars to crack bones. Overall, the mandibular corpus of the dire wolf is essentially wolf‐like, showing no special adaptations to distinguish it from that of gray wolves except that, by virtue of their larger absolute size, dire wolves were likely able to crush larger bones and gain access to valuable marrow within the bones of larger herbivores.’ This study lends support to this assertion and strengthens earlier conclusions by Hill (1991), Dundas (1994) and, more recently, Anyonge et al . (2003), where they found Ca.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Biknevicius & Van Valkenburgh (1996, p. 419) presented a compelling summary of the feeding behavior of dire wolves: ‘… like gray wolves and unlike hyaenas, dire wolves probably used their postcarnassial molars to crack bones. Overall, the mandibular corpus of the dire wolf is essentially wolf‐like, showing no special adaptations to distinguish it from that of gray wolves except that, by virtue of their larger absolute size, dire wolves were likely able to crush larger bones and gain access to valuable marrow within the bones of larger herbivores.’ This study lends support to this assertion and strengthens earlier conclusions by Hill (1991), Dundas (1994) and, more recently, Anyonge et al . (2003), where they found Ca.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This is also indicated by their absence at McKittrick and Maricopa and is consistent with other studies (31,32). A small sample size of gray wolves may give a false-negative result, but Leonard et al (31) also noted the gracile nature of the gray wolves at RLB (similar to living morphs) compared with end-Pleistocene Alaskan and Beringian wolves.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…From a competition standpoint, the observed size increase in C. l. orcutti seems suboptimal in the presence of both wolf species. However, if dire wolves competitively excluded gray wolves (31,32), larger coyotes would have been able to move into the "empty" gray wolf niche. Nowak (21) also suggested that C. l. orcutti was filling a more wolf-like role in the environment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This gray wolf insinuated itself into a carnivore guild that already contained forms both larger (dire wolf) and smaller (coyote) than itself. The presence of these two relatively common species (especially the dire wolf) seems to have prevented gray wolves from reaching high densities until after the demise of the dire wolf, approximately 10 ka BP [12]. The appearance of a more robust form of the gray wolf in eastern Beringia in the Late Pleistocene might represent evolution in situ or a secondary invasion from the Old World.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%