Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2006.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quasiprimitive groups and blow-up decompositions

Abstract: The blow-up construction by L.G. Kovács has been a very useful tool for studying embeddings of finite primitive permutation groups into wreath products in product action. In the present paper we extend the concept of a blow-up to finite quasiprimitive permutation groups, and use it to study embeddings of finite quasiprimitive groups into wreath products.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By Theorem 2.7, it suffices to show, for G ∈ {C 5 , D 5 , AGL(1, 7), PGL(2, 7), PSL (2,8), PΓL(2, 8)}, that there exists some a ∈ T n \ S n such that the semigroup a g | g ∈ G is not generated by idempotents. Using the GAP computational algebra system, it is possible to show that the required transformations a are [1, 3, 2, 2, 2], [1,2,3,3,3], [1,2,3,3,3,3,3], [6,2,3,4,6,6,6,6], [1,2,3,5,4,5,4,4,5], and [1,2,3,5,4,5,4,4,5], respectively; see Section 5 and [2] for further description of the computations.…”
Section: The Proofs Of the Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By Theorem 2.7, it suffices to show, for G ∈ {C 5 , D 5 , AGL(1, 7), PGL(2, 7), PSL (2,8), PΓL(2, 8)}, that there exists some a ∈ T n \ S n such that the semigroup a g | g ∈ G is not generated by idempotents. Using the GAP computational algebra system, it is possible to show that the required transformations a are [1, 3, 2, 2, 2], [1,2,3,3,3], [1,2,3,3,3,3,3], [6,2,3,4,6,6,6,6], [1,2,3,5,4,5,4,4,5], and [1,2,3,5,4,5,4,4,5], respectively; see Section 5 and [2] for further description of the computations.…”
Section: The Proofs Of the Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Primitive permutation groups are described by the O'Nan-Scott Theorem that divides these group into several classes. Statements of this theorem can be found in [8,Section 4.8] and in [5, Sections 4.4-4.5], while in [4] there is a detailed comparison of the different versions of the theorem that can be found in the literature. Since the order of a non-abelian finite simple group is at least 60, combining the O'Nan-Scott Theorem with the bound in Lemma 4.2 gives that a proper universal transversal group is either an almost simple group, an affine group, or a subgroup of a wreath product in product action.…”
Section: The Classification Of Universal Transversal Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The points y such that D G(64,5) (1, y) = 2 are {5, 6,7,8,9,10,11,12,15,17,18,19,20,23,25,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,40,42,45,46,47,48,50,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60}.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inclusion G W is said to be normal if M = j M (j) . Since our definition of the component M (j) is equivalent to the one given in [BPS07], an inclusion G W is normal if and only if the natural cartesian decomposition E of ∆ ℓ is M-normal, as defined in [BPS07]. The inclusion G W is normal if and only if for all T i there is a unique j such that T i M (j) ; that is, each T i acts trivially on all but one coordinate of ∆ ℓ .…”
Section: Normal Inclusionsmentioning
confidence: 99%