2003
DOI: 10.1088/0951-7715/16/4/303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quasiperiodically forced interval maps with negative Schwarzian derivative

Abstract: In the study of quasiperiodically forced systems invariant graphs have a special significance. In some cases, it was already possible to deduce statements about the invariant graphs of certain classes of systems from properties of the fibre maps. Here, we study quasiperiodically forced interval maps which are monotonically increasing and have negative Schwarzian derivative. First, we derive some basic results which only require monotonicity. Then we give a classification, with respect to the number and to the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Part a) of the following proposition can be found in [5]. In a slightly different setting, both parts were proved in the earlier paper [15]. The reader can easily adapt the proof of part b) to the present setting.…”
Section: Invariant Graphs and Their Lyapunov Exponentsmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Part a) of the following proposition can be found in [5]. In a slightly different setting, both parts were proved in the earlier paper [15]. The reader can easily adapt the proof of part b) to the present setting.…”
Section: Invariant Graphs and Their Lyapunov Exponentsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The following proposition is a consequence of negative Schwarzian derivative. Proposition 1.4 ( [15,5]). Let F ∈ F s and ν ∈ P e (S).…”
Section: Invariant Graphs and Their Lyapunov Exponentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Let T : T → T be an irrational circle rotation. Such quasiperiodically forced systems were studied by Jäger in [6,7]. He gives the following result [6,Theorem 4.2 and Corollary 4.3] under the aditional assumption that (θ, y) → f θ (y) is continuous: There are three possible cases:…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…r. 14 First of all, for the base dynamics given by f there exist exactly two ergodic invariant measures µ s and µ u which are associated to the invariant graphs by 12) where m denotes the Lebesgue measure on T1. These two measures µ i can be naturally identified withΛ-invariant measuresμ i by embedding them into the invariant 0-torus S := T2 × {0} in the canonical way.…”
Section: A Final Examplementioning
confidence: 99%