1994
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.49.3055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quasiparticle random phase approximation analysis of the double beta decay ofMo100to the ground state and excited states of

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
49
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
49
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This seems to be a characteristic problem with the transitions to excited states in 100 Ru since similar difficulties were faced in the earlier calculations of Ref. [78,79]. In these studies a simultaneous prediction of the two-neutrino double-β-decay rate of 100 Mo and the β-decay rates of 100 Tc was attempted and the g pp parameter of the pnQRPA was used for this purpose.…”
Section: B Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This seems to be a characteristic problem with the transitions to excited states in 100 Ru since similar difficulties were faced in the earlier calculations of Ref. [78,79]. In these studies a simultaneous prediction of the two-neutrino double-β-decay rate of 100 Mo and the β-decay rates of 100 Tc was attempted and the g pp parameter of the pnQRPA was used for this purpose.…”
Section: B Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it has been already conjectured that the deformation can play a crucial role in case of ββ decay of 100 Mo and 150 Nd [29,30]. Further, all the nuclei undergoing ββ decay are even-even type, in which the pairing degrees of freedom play an important role.…”
Section: The Lowestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The predicted T 2ν 1/2 in QRPA by Staudt et al [45] and in OEM by Hirsch et al [46] are larger than our predicted value for g A =1.0 by approximately a factor of 2 and 4 respectively. The 2ν ββ decay of 100 Mo for 0 + →0 + transition have been investigated by many experimental groups [18,51,[57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65] as well as theoreticians by employing different theoretical frameworks [29,30,[45][46][47]52,53,56,[66][67][68]. In comparison to the experimental M 2ν , the theoretically calculated value given by Stoica using SRPA(WS) [53] is too small.…”
Section: In Case Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case there are only 3 candidate events in the 2.8-3.2 MeV window with 2.8 (2.0+0.8) expected. With an efficiency of 4.2% this gives T 1/2 > 1.8 · 10 23 y (90% CL) and < λ > < (1.5 − 2.0) · 10 −6 , using the NME from [28].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%