1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf00727471
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quasiparticle dispersion of Sr2CuO2Cl2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Attempts to describe the results via calculations of a single hole in an AFM background (tt ′ J or 3-band models) have found difficulty in reproducing the measured energy dispersion, Fig. 14b [110][111][112]. A good fit is found if the system is instead assumed to be in a flux phase [113,114], Fig.…”
Section: Sr2cuo2cl2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attempts to describe the results via calculations of a single hole in an AFM background (tt ′ J or 3-band models) have found difficulty in reproducing the measured energy dispersion, Fig. 14b [110][111][112]. A good fit is found if the system is instead assumed to be in a flux phase [113,114], Fig.…”
Section: Sr2cuo2cl2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, it has been recently remarked that to reproduce the data for Sr 2 CuO 2 Cl 2 , the addition of a small t ′ -term to the 2D t − J model is necessary. [19] Thus, care must be taken when the fine details of different compounds at different dopings are compared. Now consider the inverse photoemission (IPES) (ω > 0) intensity in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these conclusions cast doubt on results of numerous papers with simplified interpretation of the low-energy ARPES data for Sr 2 CuO 2 Cl 2 made in the framework of the various single-band versions of the t − J model [9,10], and aimed the interpretation of the "experimental quasiparticle dispersion law" supposedly determined from positions of the photocurrent intensity maxima. Unfortunately, the available experimental data do not allow to make so far the reliable conclusions on the nature of the low-energy ARPES feature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%