2020
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.101.033831
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quasiclassical modeling of cavity quantum electrodynamics

Abstract: We model a collection of N two-level systems (TLSs) coupled to a multimode cavity via Meyer-Miller-Stock-Thoss (MMST) dynamics, sampling both electronic and photonic zero-point energies (ZPEs) and propagating independent trajectories in Wigner phase space. By investigating the ground state stability of a single TLS, we use MMST dynamics to separately study both electronic ZPE effects (which would naively lead to the breakdown of the electronic ground state) as well as photonic ZPE effects (which would naively … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
38
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
(144 reference statements)
0
38
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be clearly seen that treating the radiation mode with a classical initial distribution (green dashed line) does not account the quantum effects associated with the high frequency photon modes and thus, fails to predict accurate PMET rate constant throughout the entire range of driving force. Further, in contrast to the previous results of cavity QED, [25][26][27][28] treating the photon mode with initial Wigner distribution (orange dashed line) also fails to provide the quantitative results of the rate constants. The breakdown of the classical Wigner model is likely due to the fact that the classical equation of motion for the photon field in this calculation does not preserve the Wigner distribution, 29,31,74 a well-known limitation of the classical Wigner model leading to the incorrect flow of the photonic energy to the electronic subsystem.…”
contrasting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It can be clearly seen that treating the radiation mode with a classical initial distribution (green dashed line) does not account the quantum effects associated with the high frequency photon modes and thus, fails to predict accurate PMET rate constant throughout the entire range of driving force. Further, in contrast to the previous results of cavity QED, [25][26][27][28] treating the photon mode with initial Wigner distribution (orange dashed line) also fails to provide the quantitative results of the rate constants. The breakdown of the classical Wigner model is likely due to the fact that the classical equation of motion for the photon field in this calculation does not preserve the Wigner distribution, 29,31,74 a well-known limitation of the classical Wigner model leading to the incorrect flow of the photonic energy to the electronic subsystem.…”
contrasting
confidence: 84%
“…23,24 Recent example of the quasi-classical description of the radiation mode in cavity QED includes the classical Wigner model [25][26][27] as well as the symmetric quasi-classical window approach. 27,28 These quasi-classical approaches can significantly reduce the computational cost due to the quasi-classical treatment of the field. However, the classical Wigner model 25,26 is not expected to preserve the quantum distribution associated with the photon field, 28 which often leads to the incorrect quantum dynamics due to the leakage of the zero-point energy (ZPE).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Strategies that do not fit exactly in these groups have been explored very recently [38,39]. Furthermore, we draw attention to Rashkovskiy's work on the non-linear Schrödinger equation, where thermal radiation and spontaneous emission are described without energy quantization in a classical field framework [40,41].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to investigate whether such modification occurs, below we will model VSC and V-USC using cavity molecular dynamics (MD) simulation, where the nuclei are evolved under a realistic electronic ground-state potential surface. Such an approach is an extension of the usual simplified 1D models where the matter side is evolved as two-level systems (24)(25)(26) or coupled harmonic oscillators (16,17,27,28). Although such simplified models are adequate enough for studying Rabi splitting qualitatively by fitting experimental parameters, these models usually ignore translation, rotation, and collision, as well as the intricate structure of molecular motion, all of which are crucial for determining the dynamic properties of molecules.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%