2011
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/735/2/68
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quasi-Stellar Object Selection Algorithm Using Time Variability and Machine Learning: Selection of 1620 Quasi-Stellar Object Candidates From Macho Large Magellanic Cloud Database

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
123
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
3
123
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Initially, using a method purely based on the QSO time variability (Kim et al 2011) and later with the additional information from observations at other wavelengths and the development of a model based on the diagnostics of known QSOs (Kim et al 2012). each wave band strongly supporting the QSO selection criteria developed in this study.…”
Section: Non-qso Coloursmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Initially, using a method purely based on the QSO time variability (Kim et al 2011) and later with the additional information from observations at other wavelengths and the development of a model based on the diagnostics of known QSOs (Kim et al 2012). each wave band strongly supporting the QSO selection criteria developed in this study.…”
Section: Non-qso Coloursmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…More recently, 1 QSO was confirmed by Hony et al (2011) and 145 QSOs by Kozłowski et al (2012), the latter identified from OGLE-III light-curves. The entire MACHO database, with light-curves spanning a time range of ∼7.5 yr, was searched by Kim et al (2011Kim et al ( , 2012 who trained a support vector machine model with diagnostic features based on mid-IR colours, spectral energy distribution red-shifts and X-ray luminosity of previously known QSOs to identify 663 high confidence candidates, but none of them are at present spectroscopically confirmed. Finally, as part of a spectroscopic study on post asymptotic giant branch (AGB)…”
Section: Appendix A: Known Qsos Behind the Magellanic Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variable objects have to be distinguished from two broad types of interlopers: nonvariable objects and objects with corrupted photometry. To quantify the performance of each index following Kim et al (2011b) and Graham et al (2014), we compute the completeness C and purity P:…”
Section: Comparison Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fields cover almost the entire LMC bar (10 square degrees) to a limiting magnitude of V ≈ 22. The training set contains 6059 labeled light curves (Kim et al 2011). Table 1 shows the number of light curves per each of the available classes.…”
Section: Macho Data Setmentioning
confidence: 99%