2022
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quasi–steady‐state amide proton transfer (QUASS APT) MRI enhances pH‐weighted imaging of acute stroke

Abstract: Purpose: Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) imaging measurement depends not only on the labile proton concentration and pH-dependent exchange rate but also on experimental conditions, including the relaxation delay and radiofrequency (RF) saturation time. Our study aimed to extend a quasi-steady-state (QUASS) solution to a modified multi-slice CEST MRI sequence and test if it provides enhanced pH imaging after acute stroke. Methods: Our study derived the QUASS solution for a modified multislice CEST … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

6
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, a quasi-steady-state algorithm has been proposed that enables equilibrium CEST effect reconstruction despite the use of not sufficiently long saturation time and relaxation delay, which provides a potential solution to reduce the total scan time. [53][54][55]61,62,63 Third, the guanidine exchange rate is much faster than amide protons, which probably makes ratiometric CEST@2 ppm MRI more sensitive to pH changes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, a quasi-steady-state algorithm has been proposed that enables equilibrium CEST effect reconstruction despite the use of not sufficiently long saturation time and relaxation delay, which provides a potential solution to reduce the total scan time. [53][54][55]61,62,63 Third, the guanidine exchange rate is much faster than amide protons, which probably makes ratiometric CEST@2 ppm MRI more sensitive to pH changes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, although RF amplitude‐based ratiometric analysis provides concentration‐independent pH measurement, less susceptible to changes such as edema and proteolysis, it requires the acquisition of two Z‐spectra, hence, doubling the scan time. Recently, a quasi‐steady‐state algorithm has been proposed that enables equilibrium CEST effect reconstruction despite the use of not sufficiently long saturation time and relaxation delay, which provides a potential solution to reduce the total scan time 53–55,61,62,63 . Third, the guanidine exchange rate is much faster than amide protons, which probably makes ratiometric CEST@2 ppm MRI more sensitive to pH changes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of this, no volumetric comparisons between PET and CEST data could be made. Now that the feasibility of studying MR-CEST in this animal model has been established, we intend to acquire 3D CEST volumetric tumor data in future studies in a manner that can be compared with the 18 F-FET PET volumes (77)(78)(79)(80) In addition, the emerging quasi-steady-state CEST reconstruction potentially aids the standardization of in vivo image analysis, which can be adopted in future studies for quantitative CEST MRI (81)(82)(83). Another limitation that deserves consideration is the scarce availability of hybrid PET/MRI scanners for small animals, which means that the simultaneous acquisition of 18 F-FET and CEST MRI data for animal model development will only be possible for a few investigators.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our work generalized the QUASS solution to a sequence of two‐tiered RF saturation with GRE‐EPI readout, as shown in Figure S1 39 . Because GRE readout introduces a carryforward signal between signal averaging, an iterative numerical solution is needed, extending a recent QUASS derivation for spin echo readout 42 . Specifically, the control signal without RF saturation from the first average (na = 1) for the i th slice is given by alignleftalign-1I0normalappfalse(i,normalns,na=1false)cosαeR1wfalse[false(Td+Ts1false)+Ts2*false(i1false)false] align-1align-2+1eR1wfalse[false(Td+Ts1false)+Ts2*false(i1false)false]sinα$$ {\displaystyle \begin{array}{ll}& {I}_0^{\mathrm{app}}\left(i,\mathrm{ns},\mathrm{na}=1\right)\approx \left(\cos \alpha \cdot {e}^{-{R}_{1w}\cdot \left[\left( Td+ Ts1\right)+ Ts2\ast \left(i-1\right)\right]}\right.\\ {}& \left.\kern8em +1-{e}^{-{R}_{1w}\cdot \left[\left( Td+ Ts1\right)+ Ts2\ast \left(i-1\right)\right]}\right)\cdot \sin \alpha \end{array}} $$ where i denotes the i th slice of a total of slices (ns); α is the flip angle (FA); R 1 w is the longitudinal relaxation rate; and Td, Ts1, and Ts2 are the relaxation delay, primary RF saturation, and secondary RF saturation duration, respectively.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…39 Because GRE readout introduces a carryforward signal between signal averaging, an iterative numerical solution is needed, extending a recent QUASS derivation for spin echo readout. 42 Specifically, the control signal without RF saturation from the first average (na = 1) for the ith slice is given by…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%