The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2013.01.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quasi-stationary distributions for discrete-state models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
120
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 128 publications
0
120
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[23][24][25][26] and references therein). Having two processes in the game, we can distinguish three possible outcomes: any of the processes wins or we have a dynamical equilibrium between them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[23][24][25][26] and references therein). Having two processes in the game, we can distinguish three possible outcomes: any of the processes wins or we have a dynamical equilibrium between them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a review of results related to quasi-stationary distributions and two alternative choices (i.e., the ratio of means distribution and a doubly-limiting conditional distribution) see van Doorn and Pollett [33], and Darroch and Seneta [10, Sections 2 and 4], respectively. In the case of an absorbing CTMC with a single communicating class of transient states, which is our case here, the sub-matrix Q * recording transition rates among transient states has all its eigenvalues with negative real parts.…”
Section: The Special Case λ I = 0 Extinction Times and Quasi-stationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is particularly relevant in the setting of a birth-death process for which absorption at -1 is certain (that is, in view of (4), the setting of Theorem 1), since positivity of the decay parameter is necessary and sufficient for the existence of a quasistationary distribution (see [10,Section 5.1] for detailed information).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%