pulses radiated per antenna, and the number of antennas in an array. For example, if each pulse carries 1 mJ of energy, it would be permissible to couple up to 28,000 pulses into the breast over a 6 min period. In a practical UWB microwave radar imaging scenario, an array of antennas surrounds the breast volume and each element sequentially illuminates the breast. A typical array may contain on the order of 50 antennas, suggesting that up to 560 pulses could be transmitted by each antenna without exceeding the peak 1-g SA limit suggested in the IEEE exposure guideline. Note that the level of exposure of 560 pulses per antenna is much higher than we anticipate needing for this application.
CONCLUSIONSWe have investigated the absorption of short (120 ps, 6-GHzcarrier) microwave pulses in anatomically realistic numerical breast phantoms in an effort to formally evaluate the safety of UWB microwave breast cancer detection technology operating in the 1-11 GHz range. We have found that the SA does not vary greatly with patient-to-patient variations in breast shape, tissue composition, or fibroglandular dielectric properties. While the specific characteristics (antenna radiation patterns, coupling media properties, etc.) of future clinical systems may differ from those assumed for this computational study, the SA values are not expected to vary significantly as a function of those characteristics. The normalized SA values reported in this paper can be scaled to account for the total number of pulses radiated and different pulse energies, providing valuable guidance in the design of future clinical systems that are in compliance with safety standards. For anticipated embodiments of such a system, we conclude that UWB microwave breast cancer detection modalities pose no health risk to the patient.