2019
DOI: 10.1177/1099636219836058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quasi-static indentation analysis on three-dimensional printed continuous-fiber sandwich composites

Abstract: Fiber reinforced sandwich structures are widely used as structural elements due to their lightweight and high load-bearing capacity. In this paper, effort is taken to fabricate fiber facesheet (0°/90° orientation) and corrugated cores (trapezoidal vertical pillared, core-1 and sinusoidal vertical pillared, core-2) of the sandwich structure using fused filament fabrication and Inkjet printing techniques, respectively. Firstly, the quasi-static indentation properties of the additively manufactured facesheet, cor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The above-mentioned studies focused on the acoustic aspect of the 3D printed periodic structures without investigating the mechanical performance of the 3D printed structures. In our previous work, we focused on the compressive properties [27] and quasi-static indentation [28] of the 3D printed composite sandwich panels. Sinusoidal vertical pillared sandwich structures were found to have higher load-bearing and energy absorption capacity in comparison to trapezoidal vertical pillar structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above-mentioned studies focused on the acoustic aspect of the 3D printed periodic structures without investigating the mechanical performance of the 3D printed structures. In our previous work, we focused on the compressive properties [27] and quasi-static indentation [28] of the 3D printed composite sandwich panels. Sinusoidal vertical pillared sandwich structures were found to have higher load-bearing and energy absorption capacity in comparison to trapezoidal vertical pillar structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the laminate specimens, region I was identified as the initiation of damage at the microscopic stage (matrix cracking), region II represents the initiation of macroscopic damage such as fibre/matrix debonding, and finally region III indicates the start of damage propagation until failure of the structure (fibre breakage/rupture) [39]. On the other hand, two additional damage processes could be identified (regions IV and V) for samples, and the earlier damage points discussed were similar to those of the face sheet of the GS samples [17]. Region IV represents the core/face sheet debonding and delamination, while region V indicates the fracture of the bottom face sheets.…”
Section: Feature Analysismentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Apart from the conventional infill types, by forming the inner structure of the parts, they can be better perform under special conditions. Furthermore, several previous research has investigated the lightweight structures considering different aspects and using different techniques [6][7][8] .…”
Section: Simplified Local Infill Size Optimization For Fdm Printed Pl...mentioning
confidence: 99%