2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quasi-static cyclic tests on super-lightweight EPS concrete shear walls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Fig. 12(a) compares hysteretic behavior as well as cumulative dissipated energy from Macro-Simulink model with those from experimental results reported by Mousavi et al [34]. Calibrated hysteretic parameters of the Macro-Simulink model are not presented here due to space limitation.…”
Section: Validity Of the Frame Hysteretic Behaviormentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fig. 12(a) compares hysteretic behavior as well as cumulative dissipated energy from Macro-Simulink model with those from experimental results reported by Mousavi et al [34]. Calibrated hysteretic parameters of the Macro-Simulink model are not presented here due to space limitation.…”
Section: Validity Of the Frame Hysteretic Behaviormentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Most RC shear walls and frames with masonry infill walls revealed pinched hysteretic loops during earlier tests [34][35][36]. As a result, pinching is also considered in the model through the following modification on the lateral stiffness of the frame,…”
Section: Pinching Of the Framementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accuracy of the developed macro‐Simulink model is investigated through earlier experimental results in Figures and . Figures a and b show validity of the model in terms of deteriorating hysteretic behavior of a lightweight RC shear wall and a steel moment resisting frame braced with pre‐slacked wire ropes . Moreover, in Figure , accuracy of the macro‐Simulink model is investigated for a two‐story composite frame with concrete‐filled steel tubes with and without buckling restrained braces .…”
Section: Macro‐simulink Modelmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Validity of the macro‐Simulink model for (a) lightweight concrete shear walland (b) steel frame with pre‐slacked wire rope brace…”
Section: Macro‐simulink Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kako klizanje šipke nije uzeto u obzir, u modelu se nisu mogle definirati karakteristike gubitka krutosti. Iako se pomoću programa ABAQUS može vrlo dobro procijeniti kapacitet i ponašanje uzoraka spoja, njime se ipak ne može točno ocijeniti djelovanje gubitka krutosti na ciklično ponašanje armiranobetonskih elemenata [17]. Ovo svojstvo prvi su zamijetili Wan i dr. [18].…”
Section: Veza Između Opterećenja I Pomakaunclassified