1989
DOI: 10.1007/bf02125347
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quasi-random graphs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
180
0
11

Year Published

2000
2000
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 357 publications
(193 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
180
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…This is very surprising, since the properties may appear completely unrelated to one another. Quasirandom graphs, hypergraphs, set systems, subsets of Z N , and tournaments have been examined (see [5], [6] and [7] for details).…”
Section: K)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is very surprising, since the properties may appear completely unrelated to one another. Quasirandom graphs, hypergraphs, set systems, subsets of Z N , and tournaments have been examined (see [5], [6] and [7] for details).…”
Section: K)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second subsection discusses quasirandomness of graphs, a concept introduced by Chung, Graham and Wilson [3] (see also Thomason [31] for a similar notion). There are many ways of describing this concept, all of which are broadly equivalent (up to renaming constants); in fact, it is also equivalent to regularity (as described in the first subsection).…”
Section: Graphs: Regularity and Counting Quasirandomness And Quasirmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suppose G is a tripartite graph with parts V 1 , V 2 , V 3 Four-cycles. Suppose G = (X, Y ) is an -regular bipartite graph with density d. Let C 4 (G) be the number of labelled 4-cycles in G, i.e.…”
Section: Regularity and Countingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A weaker (yet very useful) definition is quasi-random graphs, which requires only that ∀U |E(U )| − p |U | 2 ≤ o(N 2 ). Quasi-random graphs were shown by Chung, Graham and Wilson ( [6]) to be equivalent to the surprisingly innocent condition that the number of labeled cycles of length 4 is (pN ) 4 (1±o(1)) when E(g n ) = (p±o(1)) N 2 . Several deterministic constructions are known for such quasi-random and jumbled graphs (see a recent survey by Krivelevich and Sudakov [16]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By Theorem 9(a), we can deterministically compute an irreducible polynomial of degree n in GF (3)[X] in time poly(n ) = poly(n), and can thus efficiently calculate in the field F = GF(3 n ). 6 To deterministically find an element of order M in time poly(n), run the algorithm of Theorem 9(b) and, for each output element β, directly test whether γ = β (N −1)/S has order M by computing the first M powers of γ. Note that when β generates F * , γ indeed has order M .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%