2017
DOI: 10.22331/q-2017-10-12-32
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quasi-probability distributions for observables in dynamic systems

Abstract: We develop a general framework to investigate fluctuations of non-commuting observables. To this end, we consider the Keldysh quasi-probability distribution (KQPD). This distribution provides a measurement-independent description of the observables of interest and their time-evolution. Nevertheless, positive probability distributions for measurement outcomes can be obtained from the KQPD by taking into account the effect of measurement back-action and imprecision. Negativity in the KQPD can be linked to an int… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
59
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Describing work fluctuations in genuinely coherent processes remains a subtle and open question in quantum thermodynamics, although relevant progress has been achieved recently [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][38][39][40]. Here we report the first experimental observation of work distributions, or, more precisely of transition probabilities, using an implementation based on a CM scheme [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Describing work fluctuations in genuinely coherent processes remains a subtle and open question in quantum thermodynamics, although relevant progress has been achieved recently [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][38][39][40]. Here we report the first experimental observation of work distributions, or, more precisely of transition probabilities, using an implementation based on a CM scheme [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where we consider α = β = γ = δ = 1/ √ 2 in the main text. The KQPD can then be written as [19] P c (Σ 1 , Σ 2 ) = 1 (2π) 2 dλ 1 dλ 2 e iλ1Σ1+iλ2Σ2 Tr e −i λ 2 2σ 2 e −i( λ 1 2 +γ1)σ1 |+ +|e −i( λ 1 2 −γ1)σ1 e −i λ 2 2σ 2 = σ1=0,±1 σ2=±1 P(σ 1 , σ 2 )δ(Σ 1 − σ 1 )δ(Σ 2 − σ 2 ),…”
Section: Subsequent Measurements On a Two-level Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In quantum theory, such scenarios are well described by von Neumann type measurements [15][16][17][18], where observables of interest are coupled to detectors which are subsequently measured projectively. The probability distribution describing the measurement outcomes have a natural description in terms of a quasiprobability distribution that we abbreviate with KQPD due to its reminiscence of the Keldysh path-integral formulation [19,20]. The KQPD depends on the observables of interest and can reduce to the Wigner function [21] or the full counting statistics [22].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations