2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10509-018-3467-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quasi-periodicities in cosmic rays and time lag with the solar activity at a middle latitude neutron monitor: 1982–2017

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These are the 36 days, 23 days, 12.5 days, 7.4 days, 5.6 days, 4.9 days, and 3.5 days. The obtained periodicities are in agreements with those found by several investigators [e.g., [11][12][13].…”
Section: Cosmic Ray Neutrons Periodicitiessupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These are the 36 days, 23 days, 12.5 days, 7.4 days, 5.6 days, 4.9 days, and 3.5 days. The obtained periodicities are in agreements with those found by several investigators [e.g., [11][12][13].…”
Section: Cosmic Ray Neutrons Periodicitiessupporting
confidence: 92%
“…It is clearly, evident that the 3.6 years and 1.7 years are common Quasi-periodicities between the CR and AOD time series. These periodicities are similar to those reported by several investigators and found in solar, interplanetary, and cosmic ray parameters [13][14][15][16][17][18]. The results presented in this study are preliminary, more detailed investigations of time series of atmospheric aerosol measurements and CR data at various locations and for longer time periods are recommended.…”
Section: Pos(icrc2019)1113supporting
confidence: 90%
“…All these processes are vital, but their contribution in the modulation is different and depends on the SA. Many studies of the DT problem showed that the DTs are more pronounced in odd SA cycles (Burlaga, McDonald, and Ness, 1993;Parker, 1963) than in even SA cycles (Dorman, 1959;Jokipii and Thomas, 1981) and interpreted this phenomenon in terms of drift effects (Cliver and Ling, 2001;Chowdhury, Kudela, and Dwivedi, 2013;Chowdhury and Kudela, 2018;Mavromichalaki, Belehaki, and Rafios, 1998).…”
Section: Discussion and Interpretation Of The Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 3 Correlation coefficients, r, and DTs for 10 sub-periods. In the cycles column, upward and downward arrows represent ascending and descending GCR intensity, respectively (see text and Chowdhury, Kudela, and Dwivedi (2013) and Chowdhury and Kudela (2018) discussed in detail the phenomena of GCR modulation and the DT problem between I (GCR) and various parameters characterizing conditions in the heliosphere. Chowdhury, Kudela, and Dwivedi (2013) mentioned that this is a very complex phenomenon occurring throughout the heliosphere that depends on several factors.…”
Section: Discussion and Interpretation Of The Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation