2005
DOI: 10.1090/memo/0841
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quasi-ordinary power series and their zeta functions

Abstract: The main objective of this paper is to prove the monodromy conjecture for the local Igusa zeta function of a quasi-ordinary polynomial of arbitrary dimension defined over a number field. In order to do it, we compute the local Denef-Loeser motivic zeta function Z DL (h, T ) of a quasi-ordinary power series h of arbitrary dimension over an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero from its characteristic exponents without using embedded resolution of singularities. This allows us to effectively represen… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
60
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(36 reference statements)
1
60
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Then we can finally state the following theorem ( [ACLM,Theorem 2.4]; compare with the second remark after Theorem 4.2 in [DH] by 'replacing' L by p and T by p −s ).…”
Section: Every Pointmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Then we can finally state the following theorem ( [ACLM,Theorem 2.4]; compare with the second remark after Theorem 4.2 in [DH] by 'replacing' L by p and T by p −s ).…”
Section: Every Pointmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The conjecture is still open in arbitrary dimension. Particular cases are proved in [2,3,5,10,11,13,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This conjecture was proved for n = 2 by Loeser (originally in the context of p-adic Igusa zeta functions) in [11]. There are by now various other partial results, for example, [3,4,10,12,14,17].…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…It is natural and useful to study these invariants incorporating such a more general ω; see, for example, [3,4,16]. Note, however, that there one restricts to the situation where supp(div(ω)) ⊂ f −1 {0}.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%