1991
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1991)117:3(657)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quasi‐Newton Method for Reinforced‐Concrete Column Analysis and Design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
17
0
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
17
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…1). It is also frequently assumed that plane sections remain plane, that the tensile strength of concrete is negligible [2][3][4] and that the concrete stress distribution can be represented by a rectangular stress-block [5,6]. From these assumptions, the derivation of an interaction diagram is relatively simple.…”
Section: Interaction Diagrams For Ambient Temperature Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1). It is also frequently assumed that plane sections remain plane, that the tensile strength of concrete is negligible [2][3][4] and that the concrete stress distribution can be represented by a rectangular stress-block [5,6]. From these assumptions, the derivation of an interaction diagram is relatively simple.…”
Section: Interaction Diagrams For Ambient Temperature Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assumptions made in this implementation are: plane sections remain plane; the concrete compressive stress-strain behaviour is as given in Eurocode 2 [21]; the tensile strength of concrete is zero; the stress-strain relationship of steel is elasto-plastic; and there is no bond slip between steel and concrete. Each of these assumptions has been made in various combinations by other authors [2,9,22]. They result in a marginally conservative estimate of strength (with the exception of bond slip).…”
Section: Ambient Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Santathadaporn and Chen [28] investigated the strength limit states of rectangular and wide-flange H-sections under combined biaxial flexure and axial load, and proposed the interaction equations based on an analytical method to evaluate the lower and upper bounds of ultimate strength for these two sections. Yen [29] presented a quasi-Newton iterative approach applicable in computer application for analysis and design of reinforced-concrete cross-sections subjected to uniaxial or biaxial forces. Yau et al [30] proposed a numerical method for analyzing arbitrarily shaped reinforced-concrete cross-sections under biaxial bending.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present work sets out an iterative procedure, an alternative to the well-known quasi-Newton method proposed by Yen [6], in order to get the section stiffness modulus E·I, from which the bar stiffness is deduced. The procedure, developed for a general loading case (axial force and two biaxial bending moments) and which takes into consideration nonlinear constituent equations of materials, it locates the equilibrium position of the section from the bisection method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%