1996
DOI: 10.1515/mcma.1996.2.1.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods for Numerical Integration: Comparison of Different Low Discrepancy Sequences

Abstract: Further numerical experience on quasi-Monte Carlo integration is established. Different kinds of low discrepancy point sequences including Halton, Sobol', Faure, and Niederreiter sequences are considered and a new family of test functions is used.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…stream 0 -leap 5 and leap 33). These effects (and differences to earlier findings) may be due to the fact that we use a test function with singularity located in the origin and that leaping in general reduces the share of points taken from the start of the original sequence (which is known to be of lower quality [39,40]). It is also interesting to note that there are significant differences among the results of the different streams.…”
Section: Single Substream Resultscontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…stream 0 -leap 5 and leap 33). These effects (and differences to earlier findings) may be due to the fact that we use a test function with singularity located in the origin and that leaping in general reduces the share of points taken from the start of the original sequence (which is known to be of lower quality [39,40]). It is also interesting to note that there are significant differences among the results of the different streams.…”
Section: Single Substream Resultscontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…For g 3 , the constant α s is determined numerically so that g 3 also integrates to 1. The first function was proposed in Radovic et al [1996] and is also used, for example, in Wang and Hickernell [2000]. Here we consider the same choices that have been studied in these two papers, that is (i) α j = 0.01, (ii) α j = 1; (iii) α j = j , and (iv) α j = j 2 , for 1 ≤ j ≤ s.…”
Section: Test-functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This function was …rst considered by Radović, Sobol', Tichy [14], and used subsequently by several authors. The exact value of the integral is one, and the sensitivity of the function to x i quickly decreases as a i increases.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%