2018
DOI: 10.1137/16m1082597
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quasi--Monte Carlo Integration for Affine-Parametric, Elliptic PDEs: Local Supports and Product Weights

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While retaining linear scaling w.r. to the spatial resolution of the approximate GRF in D, the hierarchical nature of multiresolution analyses (MRAs) naturally enables multilevel QMC (MLQMC) algorithms with a discretization level dependent resolution of GRF and QMC integration. In addition, as observed by us recently in [20,31], the localization of the supports of the representation system in D allows us to use QMC quadrature with product weights. This, in turn, is known to afford linear scaling of the work with respect to the parameter dimension s to compute the QMC generating vectors (see [14,42] and the references there).…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While retaining linear scaling w.r. to the spatial resolution of the approximate GRF in D, the hierarchical nature of multiresolution analyses (MRAs) naturally enables multilevel QMC (MLQMC) algorithms with a discretization level dependent resolution of GRF and QMC integration. In addition, as observed by us recently in [20,31], the localization of the supports of the representation system in D allows us to use QMC quadrature with product weights. This, in turn, is known to afford linear scaling of the work with respect to the parameter dimension s to compute the QMC generating vectors (see [14,42] and the references there).…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This may also be achieved by exponentially decaying ψ j , which are not compactly supported, see [8]. An assumption of the type of (A1) in the case of so called affine-parametric coefficients in conjunction with the application of QMC with product weights was already discussed by us in [20]. In the present work, we extend our analysis of [31] to a MLQMC-FE algorithm with log-Gaussian inputs to reduce the overall work.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Similarly, the sequence D α (S) can be identified with a digital sequence over To construct an interlaced finite point set D α (P ), one can use polynomial lattice point sets in dimension αs instead of digital (t, m, αs)-nets. The resulting point set D α (P ) is called an interlaced polynomial lattice point set, and has been often used in applications of HoQMC methods, see [18,17,20,11,30,31,32,12]. Here we need to find good generating vectors q = (q 1 , .…”
Section: Digit Interlacing Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note, however, that the assumption of product weights is rather limiting. For instance, for integration problems involving parameterized PDEs, the best convergence rates known up to now are obtained by considering weighted space for the parameter-to-solution map with (S)POD weights [9,12,17], whereas weighted spaces with product weights lead to the best known rates only for special models [7,11,14]. In this paper we extend these results to the case of kernel approximation (as opposed to integration) of the parameterto-solution map, and we are able to show dimension-independent convergence rates using (S)POD weights in the general case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%