1989
DOI: 10.1215/ijm/1255988725
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quasi-hereditary algebras

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
188
0
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 240 publications
(192 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
188
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Let T (x · λ) ∈ λ O be the indecomposable tilting module with M (x · λ) occurring as a submodule in any Verma flag. (For the classification we refer to [CI89], and for the general theory to [DR89], for example. )…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let T (x · λ) ∈ λ O be the indecomposable tilting module with M (x · λ) occurring as a submodule in any Verma flag. (For the classification we refer to [CI89], and for the general theory to [DR89], for example. )…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dlab and Ringel [13] have shown that every finite dimensional algebra B is of the form eAe for some quasi-hereditary algebra A. In a weak sense, the algebra A can be considered as a Schur algebra of B.…”
Section: Schur Algebras For Cellular Algebrasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, a costandard module (λ) is defined as the greatest submodule of an injective enveloping module I(λ) for L(λ) such that all of its composition factors are indexed by weights µ ≤ λ. A fundamental notion of a quasihereditary algebra was introduced in [8,9]. Under the same initial data as above, A is said to be quasihereditary if kernels of natural epimorphisms P (λ) → (λ) have filtrations with factors (µ), µ > λ.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%