2012
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quasi-experimental trial of diabetes Self-Management Automated and Real-Time Telephonic Support (SMARTSteps) in a Medicaid managed care plan: study protocol

Abstract: BackgroundHealth information technology can enhance self-management and quality of life for patients with chronic disease and overcome healthcare barriers for patients with limited English proficiency. After a randomized controlled trial of a multilingual automated telephone self-management support program (ATSM) improved patient-centered dimensions of diabetes care in safety net clinics, we collaborated with a nonprofit Medicaid managed care plan to translate research into practice, offering ATSM as a covered… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While we did not ask questions about income level, the patient population at this hospital is known to be low income. 35,36 All participants self-identified as having type 2 diabetes, having depressive symptoms, or being a caregiver for someone with a chronic condition in order to participate in the testing of the concordant category of apps. In addition to these conditions, we asked participants if they had asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), heart disease, high blood pressure, heart failure, and chronic kidney disease.…”
Section: Study Setting and Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While we did not ask questions about income level, the patient population at this hospital is known to be low income. 35,36 All participants self-identified as having type 2 diabetes, having depressive symptoms, or being a caregiver for someone with a chronic condition in order to participate in the testing of the concordant category of apps. In addition to these conditions, we asked participants if they had asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), heart disease, high blood pressure, heart failure, and chronic kidney disease.…”
Section: Study Setting and Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16,27 Briefly, participants were recruited from 4 clinics in the Community Health Network of San Francisco (CHNSF) 26,28,29 SFHP members with diabetes who participated in SMARTSteps were randomized to one of 4 groups: SMARTSteps-ONLY, SMARTSteps-PLUS, or a wait-list for either intervention. The intervention focused on improving selfmanagement related to behaviors such as taking medications appropriately, eating a healthy diet, exercising and being physically active, depressive symptoms, and checking one's blood sugar level and one's feet for wounds and sores.…”
Section: Study Design and Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through the SMARTSteps program from 2009 to 2013, we enrolled and followed patients with diabetes; these patients were randomly assigned to receive a self-management, automated, and real-time telephonic support program, or usual care. 5,[21][22] The SMARTSteps study included 362 participants aged 18 years or older, who had type 2 diabetes and received primary care at 1 of 4 publicly funded clinics in the Community Health Network of San Francisco (CHNSF) and who spoke English, Cantonese, or Spanish. We assessed diabetes diagnosis through the CHNSF diabetes registry, a combination of SFHP pharmacy claims with confirmation of clinician-documented diagnosis of diabetes, fasting glucose Ն 126 mg/dL, or A1C Ն 7%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22,28 Functional health indicators included the SF-12 for the physical and mental health components, and the reported number of bed days in the previous 30 days. 21,22 We calculated descriptive statistics, including percentages for use of CHA and other categorical variables and means and standard deviations for continuous variables. In bivariate analyses, we compared 1) participants who used any CHA to those participants who did not, and 2) participants who used a single CHA modality to those participants with multiple CHA modalities.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%