2010
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.81.063523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quasar variability limits on cosmological density of cosmic strings

Abstract: We put robust upper limits on the average cosmological density Ωs of cosmic strings based on the variability properties of a large homogeneous sample of SDSS quasars. We search for an excess of characteristic variations of quasar brightness that are associated with string lensing and use the observed distribution of this variation to constrain the density of strings. The limits obtained do not invoke any clustering of strings, apply to both open segments and closed loops of strings, usefully extend over a wide… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, our masses are larger than those reported by pa-rameter fits to the CMB [7][8][9][10] as well as gravitational wave searches [12,13]. The recent microlensing search carried out on SDSS quasars [16] is sensitive to very lowmass strings, but reports a similar sensitivity for Ω strings . Our direct searches may be sensitive to a particular class of strings that could be missed by other searches.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…However, our masses are larger than those reported by pa-rameter fits to the CMB [7][8][9][10] as well as gravitational wave searches [12,13]. The recent microlensing search carried out on SDSS quasars [16] is sensitive to very lowmass strings, but reports a similar sensitivity for Ω strings . Our direct searches may be sensitive to a particular class of strings that could be missed by other searches.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…For instance, since the universal loop distribution plotted in Fig. 2 is significantly different than the loop distributions used so far in the literature, various constraints on GU coming from gravitational wave emission, lensing or pulsar-timing should be re-examined [32,33,69,34,70]. All along the calculation, we have kept γ d and γ c as undetermined parameters (apart from the numerical examples) since these parameters may equally well be used to represent other physical effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the CMB analysis based on WMAP and the South Pole Telescope yields an upper bound on the string tension as Gµ < 1.7 × 10 −7 [38], and this constraint has been recently improved to be Gµ < 1.3×10 −7 with the help of the Planck data [39]. As cosmic strings can also lead to relic gravitational waves in the form of a stochastic background, a model-dependent constraint from the pulsar timing measurements on the string tension can be obtained in about the same order of the bound from CMB [40][41][42][43][44][45]. Further constraints on SCSs can be derived through the spectral distortions of the CMB photons [11][12][13], namely, the parameter region with 10 −19 < Gµ < 10 −7 and I > 10 4 GeV would be ruled out [46].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%