2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quartz Crystal Microbalance (QCM) sensor arrays selection for olive oil sensory evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So, several gas-, liquid-and mass-spectrometry chromatography, DNA and spectroscopy based methods have been developed to assess olive oil quality and authenticity as well as to detect possible adulterations [3,5,6,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. Electrochemical sensors have also been extensively used, including electronic noses and electronic tongues (E-tongues), individually or in combination, mainly with the aim of identifying possible adulterations or classifying olive oils according to quality level, geographical origin or olive cultivar [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. Recently, a "magnetic tongue" was used to quantify minor compounds of EVOO that are related to the sensory attributes [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, several gas-, liquid-and mass-spectrometry chromatography, DNA and spectroscopy based methods have been developed to assess olive oil quality and authenticity as well as to detect possible adulterations [3,5,6,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. Electrochemical sensors have also been extensively used, including electronic noses and electronic tongues (E-tongues), individually or in combination, mainly with the aim of identifying possible adulterations or classifying olive oils according to quality level, geographical origin or olive cultivar [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. Recently, a "magnetic tongue" was used to quantify minor compounds of EVOO that are related to the sensory attributes [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, electronic noses (E-noses) and electronic tongues (E-tongues), individually or combined, have been proposed in the last decade for olive oil characterisation (Ruiz-Samblás et al, 2012) using different multivariate statistical techniques. E-noses have been successfully used to classify and discriminate EVOO, VOO and LOO (Escuderos, Sánchez, & Jiménez, 2010;Escuderos, Sánchez, & Jiménez, 2011;García-González, & Aparicio, 2004); to classify VOO according to their geographical origin (Haddi et al, 2011), and to differentiate single-cultivar or multi-cultivar EVOO according to Protected Designation of Origin (Cimato et al, 2006). Voltammetric E-tongues have been applied with success to separate EVOO, VOO, LOO and refined olive oils (Apetrei, & Apetrei, 2013;Apetrei, Rodríguez-Méndez, & de Saja, 2005;Oliveri, Baldo, Daniele, & Forina, 2009) and to distinguish EVOO from maize oils, different EVOO from the same geographical region or EVOO from different countries (Oliveri et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, sensory evaluation is mainly used to classify olive oils as LOO, VOO, or EVOO according to their positive and/or negative organoleptic sensations. In the last years, several analytical approaches, ranging from expensive chromatographic [2,6,[9][10][11][12][13]]-, DNA [14]-, or nondestructive spectroscopy [15,16]-based methods to fast and low-cost electrochemical devices [3,13,[17][18][19], have been reported. These methods showed satisfactory predictive performances regarding olive oil quality assessment and classification, including the successful Abstract Olive oil quality grading is traditionally assessed by human sensory evaluation of positive and negative attributes (olfactory, gustatory, and final olfactorygustatory sensations).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%