2009
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2008-1369
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quarter and cow risk factors associated with the occurrence of clinical mastitis in dairy cows in the United Kingdom

Abstract: Quarter and cow risk factors associated with the development of clinical mastitis (CM) during lactation were investigated during a 12-mo longitudinal study on 8 commercial Holstein-Friesian dairy farms in the southwest of England. The individual risk factors studied on 1,677 cows included assessments of udder and leg hygiene, teat-end callosity, and hyperkeratosis; body condition score; and measurements of monthly milk quality and yield. Several outcome variables for CM were used for statistical analysis, whic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
113
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(57 reference statements)
18
113
0
Order By: Relevance
“…investigations, teat cleanliness can be an indicator of hygiene in the cows' environment and good cubicle and barn hygiene were found to be correlated with good udder health (Bartlett et al, 1992;O'Reilly et al, 2006;Breen et al, 2009). In other studies, aspects of milking technology such as less frequent technology check, automatic cluster removal, high milking vacuum and cleanliness of milking parlor have been reported to have a negative influence on udder health (Østeras and Lund, 1988;Barkema et al, 1998), whereas in general, the factors of milking technology and feeding of lactating cows in the presented investigation show no significant association to udder health.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…investigations, teat cleanliness can be an indicator of hygiene in the cows' environment and good cubicle and barn hygiene were found to be correlated with good udder health (Bartlett et al, 1992;O'Reilly et al, 2006;Breen et al, 2009). In other studies, aspects of milking technology such as less frequent technology check, automatic cluster removal, high milking vacuum and cleanliness of milking parlor have been reported to have a negative influence on udder health (Østeras and Lund, 1988;Barkema et al, 1998), whereas in general, the factors of milking technology and feeding of lactating cows in the presented investigation show no significant association to udder health.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An increased risk of high somatic cell count and intramammary infections has been associated with cows having dirty udders and legs (Schreiner and Ruegg, 2003;Ellis et al, 2007;Breen et al, 2009). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A third feature of the model was that loss in milk yield was expressed as a linear regression per day with respect to the time of diagnosis, adjusted for known control variables such as herd, parity, stage of lactation (Breen et al, 2009). Notwithstanding, the model was very simple and other putative risk factors, not already included in the model, could easily be tested.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%