1982
DOI: 10.1016/0370-1573(82)90035-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quark masses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

94
1,296
9
6

Year Published

1985
1985
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,871 publications
(1,405 citation statements)
references
References 170 publications
94
1,296
9
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The electromagnetic contribution isδm N = O(α em M QCD /4π), which is O(εm 3 π /M 2 QCD ) and about the 20% of δm N . From the Cottingham sum rule [57] one findsδm N = −(0.76 ± 0.30) MeV, which is consistent with dimensional analysis. In order to achieve the form (6) for L P T , we have used a field redefinition [53] to eliminate the nucleon mass difference term in favor of pionic mass and interaction terms.…”
Section: P -And T -Conserving Chiral Lagrangiansupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The electromagnetic contribution isδm N = O(α em M QCD /4π), which is O(εm 3 π /M 2 QCD ) and about the 20% of δm N . From the Cottingham sum rule [57] one findsδm N = −(0.76 ± 0.30) MeV, which is consistent with dimensional analysis. In order to achieve the form (6) for L P T , we have used a field redefinition [53] to eliminate the nucleon mass difference term in favor of pionic mass and interaction terms.…”
Section: P -And T -Conserving Chiral Lagrangiansupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Most models estimate thatδm N ≈ −α/R N ≃ −1.5 MeV [2], in which case δm N ≃ 3 MeV. We will refer to these values, which are also consistent with the results of Gasser and Leutwyler [11], as "quark model estimates" .…”
supporting
confidence: 81%
“…Indeed, A f b nearly vanishes if this is 1 MeV instead of 4 MeV. However, there are estimates cited in the reviews [1,2,11] which would obtain δm N −δm N /2 significantly greater than 4 MeV. The energy dependence of the amplitudes around this energy is as expected (s wave independent of momentum, p wave proportional to q).…”
mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Even for the smallest universe that we shall consider, with radius 100 microns, there is good separation (a factor [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] between the electroweak scale and the strong interaction scale. Heavy quarks, electroweak gauge bosons, Higgs particles, etc.…”
Section: Elementary Particle Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is composed of two pieces. The dominant one is due to the mass difference of the up and down (current-) quarks, and the other is electromagnetic [11]. Schematically we may write…”
Section: Nuclear and Atomic Mattermentioning
confidence: 99%