2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2103.09844
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quark and Gluon Contents of a Lepton at High Energies

Tao Han,
Yang Ma,
Keping Xie

Abstract: In high-energy leptonic collisions, such as at a multi-TeV muon collider, the collinear splittings of the electroweak (EW) gauge bosons and leptons are the dominant phenomena, and the scattering processes should thus be formulated in terms of the EW parton distribution functions (EW PDFs). We complete this formalism in the Standard Model to include the QCD sector and evaluate the quark and gluon PDFs inside a lepton at the double-log accuracy. The splittings of the photon and subsequently the quarks and gluons… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(83 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In scenarios 1 and 2, the most identifiable final state will be U 1 → bμ, and we will always focus on this decay channel unless otherwise noted. In flavor scenarios 3 and 4, however, the large β 33 L coupling means that the U 1 → bτ decay mode always has an appreciable branching ratio, while BR(U 1 → bμ) 1% already for β 32 L < 0.1. We will therefore consider only τ final states for scenarios 3 and 4, though a more detailed analysis could in principle include additional information from other final states as well.…”
Section: Production Modesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In scenarios 1 and 2, the most identifiable final state will be U 1 → bμ, and we will always focus on this decay channel unless otherwise noted. In flavor scenarios 3 and 4, however, the large β 33 L coupling means that the U 1 → bτ decay mode always has an appreciable branching ratio, while BR(U 1 → bμ) 1% already for β 32 L < 0.1. We will therefore consider only τ final states for scenarios 3 and 4, though a more detailed analysis could in principle include additional information from other final states as well.…”
Section: Production Modesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. These structures are somewhat motivated by a U (2) 5 symmetry breaking pattern, which allows for a potentially large β 33 L coupling and treats the off-diagonal β 32 L as a spurion [71]. The four scenarios are primarily chosen, though, to give a representative picture of the phenomenology at a muon collider in different flavor structures.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The number of muons available at a beam dump experiment associated with a high-energy collider depends significantly on the beam design, for which at this time there are only rough proposals. Parametrically, the number of muons in a collider beam, per unit time, is given by Ṅµ = f 0 × n b × N µ/bunch (14) where f 0 is the muon source repetition rate (i.e., the rate at which the muons are generated by the source, which could be either a proton or a positron beam), n b is the number of colliding bunches in each beam, and N µ/bunch is the number of muons per bunch. Assuming the MAP design parameters [6,78] (f 0 = 5 Hz, N µ/bunch = 2×10 12 , n b = 1), this translates to Ṅµ ∼ 10 20 /year generated for collisions.…”
Section: Notes On the Expected Number Of Muons On Targetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a muon collider (µC) is a particularly compelling option as it affords a complementary physics program to that of a high-energy hadron collider like the LHC. For example, with a µC we gain access to direct couplings of both electroweak-mediated and secondgeneration processes [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. Additionally, with increased available center-of-mass energy, we can expand our discovery prospects for massive new physics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%