1994
DOI: 10.1021/j100097a024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum Yields of H(2S) and CH3S(2E) from the Photolysis of Simple Organosulfur Compounds at 193, 222, and 248 nm

Abstract: The primary quantum yields for the formation of H(2S), @(H), and CH3S(2E), @(CH3S), in the photodissociation of methyl mercaptan, dimethyl sulfide (DMS), and dimethyl disulfide (DMDS) at the excimer laser wavelengths of 193, 222, and 248 nm were measured. @(H) were measured using resonance fluorescence detection of H atoms. The @(H) were 0.55 f 0.04 at 193 nm, 0.98 f 0.15 at 222 nm, and 1.09 f 0.25 at 248 nm for methyl mercaptan; (0.02 at 222 nm and <0.03 at 193 nm for DMS; and <0.06 at 222 nm and <0.08 at 193… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
40
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…52 As shown in Fig. The major channels for UV photolysis of CH 3 SSCH 3 , CH 3 SCH 3 , and CH 3 SH are CH 3 S+CH 3 S, CH 3 +CH 3 S, and CH 3 S+H, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…52 As shown in Fig. The major channels for UV photolysis of CH 3 SSCH 3 , CH 3 SCH 3 , and CH 3 SH are CH 3 S+CH 3 S, CH 3 +CH 3 S, and CH 3 S+H, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…52 At 193 nm, the C-S bond scission to produce CH 3 SS+ CH 3 becomes more important. 52 At 193 nm, the C-S bond scission to produce CH 3 SS+ CH 3 becomes more important.…”
Section: Photolysis Of Ch 3 Sschmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At 193 nm it equally competes with the SH cleavage. 17,18,19 The methanthiol in the present study was photolyzed at 266 nm generated from the fourth harmonic ͑15 mJ͒ of a Nd:YAG laser.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measured H atom signals were placed on an absolute basis by generating a known concentration of H atoms via the 248-nm photolysis of CH 3 SH (Φ ) 1 and σ ) 3.0 × 10 -19 cm 2 molecule -1 ). 32,33 From the measured detection sensitivity and the calculated [O] 0 , the branching ratio for H atom production was found to be 0.07 ( 0.02. To verify the determination of the CH 3 SH concentration, the rate coefficient for the H + CH 3 SH reaction was measured and found to be (2.1 ( 0.2) × 10 -12 cm 3 molecule -1 s -1 , in agreement with the value reported by Wine et al 32 The analysis of the H atom temporal profiles also yielded a rate coefficient of (7.9 ( 0.8) × 10 -12 cm 3 molecule -1 s -1 for the reaction of H atoms with CH 3 I, which was the primary loss process for H atoms in this system.…”
Section: Yield Of Ch 3 O In Reactionmentioning
confidence: 99%